Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings · New York

Polo Grounds Towers

New York, NY · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Polo Grounds Towers runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings workplace, earning a grade F.

Polo Grounds Towers: 3.5 TCR = 249% of Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Polo Grounds Towers safety composite

Polo Grounds Towers scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2017→2024

Polo Grounds Towers injury rate improved

Polo Grounds Towers's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #139/364
  • PHOTO Bailey Ave-Ft Indepe…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bailey Ave-Ft Independnce (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Polo Grounds Towers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Polo Grounds Towers averages 3.5 TCR (249% of the Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Polo Grounds Towers TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Polo Grounds Towers falls in its industry

1,100 Lessors of residential buildin establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 364 Lessors of residential buildin employers in New York.

Polo Grounds Towers (56 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Polo Grounds Towers
Polo Grounds Towers (56 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Polo Grounds Towers has more employees than the Lessors of residential buildings and dwe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2017 8.6 6.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · NY · New York

1,100 Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bailey Ave-Ft Independnce 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern MI Region - Solomon Apartment Management 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nob Hill 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lerner Corporation 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar Communities Inc. dba SunCommon 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orsted - New York City 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Federated Co-ops, Inc. - St Cloud Cenex 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Forge - Portland, IN 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - STN1 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dallas (North) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indio CA Truss 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conroe TX Truss 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosenberg TX Millwork 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.