Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, vermiculite) installation · Wisconsin

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan

Sheboygan, WI · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan runs at 369% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, vermiculite) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan: 10.3 TCR = 369% of Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, vermiculite) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan safety composite

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2023→2024

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan injury rate improved

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan's TCR fell 1.2 from 10.9 in 2023 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=10.9 · 2024=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Sheboygan, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 369% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/34
  • PHOTO IBP of Tulsa
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IBP of Tulsa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan averages 10.3 TCR (369% of the Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, vermiculite) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan TCR series: 2023=10.9 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan falls in its industry

1,613 Blown-in insulation (e.g., cel establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 34 Blown-in insulation (e.g., cel employers in Wisconsin.

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan (20 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan
Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan (20 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Weatherization Operation - Sheboygan has fewer employees than the Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, ve median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 10.9 10.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · WI · Sheboygan

1,613 Blown-in insulation (e.g., cellulose, vermiculite) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 138 employers in Sheboygan, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IBP of Tulsa 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weatherproof and New England Smart Energy 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR A+ Insulation #640 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Chester Insulation, Inc. 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Power Systems 1,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kohler Energy Mosel 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Sheboygan Memorial Medical Center 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheboygan 893 FTE
NAT-TCR Mopev - Pevely 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Centrifugal Services 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Ave 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marburger Farm Dairy, INC 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concept Steel Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sands Plumbing, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. N. Lynch Co., Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westside Hulling Association 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.