Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Wesley Pines Retirement Community

Lumberton, NC · ~131 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wesley Pines Retirement Community runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Wesley Pines Retirement Community: 7.2 TCR = 189% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wesley Pines Retirement Community safety composite

Wesley Pines Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2016→2024

Wesley Pines Retirement Community injury rate improved

Wesley Pines Retirement Community's TCR fell 10.1 from 13.8 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lumberton, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #69/105
  • PHOTO The Shores
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Shores (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wesley Pines Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wesley Pines Retirement Community averages 7.2 TCR (189% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wesley Pines Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=13.8 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Wesley Pines Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Wesley Pines Retirement Community (131 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wesley Pines Retirement Community
Wesley Pines Retirement Community (131 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Wesley Pines Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 4 0 0
2023 6.7 6.7 7 0 0
2022 7.9 7.9 8 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2016 13.8 3.0 5 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Lumberton

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 80 employers in Lumberton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Shores 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Michael's Assisted Living 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningstar Senior Living 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Village at Bloomington 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith and Jennings Inc 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piedmont Maintenance and Services of Roxboro, Inc. 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global MONC 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Roaring River 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC HEALTH SOUTHEASTERN 1,792 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1155 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1155 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quickie Manufacturing 307 FTE
NAT-TCR Mccabe Lumber 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kearny 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Prattville Medical Park 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dun-Rite Electrical Services, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Beverage Packaging, LLC - Olympia Plant 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrison Products Dallas 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milk Specialties Global Eden Prairie 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brieser Construction 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.