Aircraft manufacturing · Florida

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc.

Melbourne, FL · ~712 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 71% of Aircraft manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. safety composite

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2024

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. injury rate improved

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.9 from 6.1 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #14/24
  • PHOTO Gulfstream Aerospace
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 121 inj
  • SIZE ~712 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gulfstream Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (71% of the Aircraft manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. falls in its industry

390 Aircraft manufacturing establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 24 Aircraft manufacturing employers in Florida.

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. (712 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc.
Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. (712 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Embraer Executive Aircraft, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.7 10 1 0
2023 1.1 0.9 9 1 0
2022 1.6 0.7 13 0 0
2021 1.7 1.4 11 0 0
2020 1.6 1.3 10 0 0
2019 2.1 1.2 14 0 0
2018 4.0 3.0 23 0 0
2017 1.6 1.0 8 0 0
2016 6.1 4.3 23 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · FL · Melbourne

390 Aircraft manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gulfstream Aerospace 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA033 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation - Able Engineering 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - El Mirage 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE FL_Orlando_65 South Keller Road_00620110 711 FTE
STATE-SIZE Family Home Health Services LLC 713 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton Orlando, Grande Lakes 710 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyatt Regency Orlando 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR WI Roller - ARCo 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corner Market #6067 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ADMINISTRATION 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Northern Corporation - Chippewa Falls 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bollinger Shipyards Lockport 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mount St. Mary's Hospital 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havasu Regional Medical Center 712 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmeriTemps - Irving 712 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.