Fish and wildlife conservation program administration · North Carolina

Wildlife Resources Commission

Name: Wildlife Resources Commission Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Raleigh, NC · ~606 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 5.0
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wildlife Resources Commission runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fish and wildlife conservation program administration workplace, earning a grade D.

Wildlife Resources Commission: 5.0 TCR = 156% of Fish and wildlife conservation program administration BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wildlife Resources Commission safety composite

Wildlife Resources Commission scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2022

Wildlife Resources Commission injury rate improved

Wildlife Resources Commission's TCR fell 2.3 from 6.7 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 156% of ind

DART 1.7 DART
RANK #8/16
PHOTO Parks and Recreation
BOOK 3y book
INJ 88 inj
SIZE ~606 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parks and Recreation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

5
Parks and Recr

5
City of Cheboy

5
Pointsettia RC

5
Glenview Golf

5

What this shows Wildlife Resources Commission averages 5.0 TCR (156% of the Fish and wildlife conservation program administration BLS benchmark).

Wildlife Resources Commission TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2020=3.9 · 2022=4.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Wildlife Resources Commission falls in its industry

413 Fish and wildlife conservation establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Fish and wildlife conservation employers in North Carolina.

Wildlife Resources Commission (606 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Wildlife Resources Commission has more employees than the Fish and wildlife conservation program a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	4.4	1.7	27	1
2020	3.9	2.1	19	5
2016	6.7	1.6	42	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · NC · Raleigh

413 Fish and wildlife conservation program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Parks and Recreation	SAN DIEGO, CA	5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Cheboygan-Department of Parks and Recreation	CHEBOYGAN, MI	5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pointsettia RC	LOS ANGELES, CA	5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Glenview Golf Club	GLENVIEW, IL	5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION	CHARLOTTE	606 FTE
STATE-SIZE	City of Raleigh- Fire Department	RALEIGH	606 FTE
STATE-SIZE	City of Greensboro Fire Department	GREENSBORO	605 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BioMerieux Durham	DURHAM	604 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Headway Workforce Solutions	Raleigh	13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NC State University	Raleigh	11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UNC Rex Healthcare	Raleigh	7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SECU	Raleigh	6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR	Western Buildes of Amarillo, Inc.	Amarillo, TX	5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Es-Pres Mer Mc	Aurora, IL	5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	5472-NAI-0034-0034-01945	Haddonfield, NJ	5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Price Less Foods #485	Bowling Green, KY	5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Pambg - Harrisburg	Mechanicsburg, PA	606 FTE
NAT-SIZE	P.M.G. Publishing LLC	Scottsdale, AZ	606 FTE
NAT-SIZE	McNeil Health Care, LLC	Las Piedras, PR	606 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ogden City - Public Services	Ogden, UT	606 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.