Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit · Minnesota

Wilson McShane, duluth

Duluth, MN · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wilson McShane, duluth runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit workplace, earning a grade C.

Wilson McShane, duluth: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wilson McShane, duluth safety composite

Wilson McShane, duluth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wilson McShane, duluth held a steady TCR band

Wilson McShane, duluth's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 525120 · Duluth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Wilson McShane, Miss…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wilson McShane, Missouri (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wilson McShane, duluth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wilson McShane, duluth averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Wilson McShane, duluth TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Wilson McShane, duluth falls in its industry

12 Plans, health and welfare rela establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Wilson McShane, duluth (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 10 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Building Service 32BJ Benefit FundsMotion Picture Industry Pension and Health PlansCity of Bridgeport / Health DepartmentSCAN Health PlanCity of Bridgeport Health DepartmentWilson McShane, MissouriWilson McShane, KansasWilson McShane, BloomingtonSCAN GroupWilson McShane, duluth
Wilson McShane, duluth (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 191 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Wilson McShane, duluth has fewer employees than the Plans, health and welfare related employ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

525120 · MN · Duluth

12 Plans, health and welfare related employee benefit employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 340 employers in Duluth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wilson McShane, Missouri 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson McShane, Kansas 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Group 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCAN Health Plan 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pleasant View Gardens 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bennett Moving LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix at Viking 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALLOY HARDFACING AND ENGINEERING CO., INC. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Medical Center 3,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building D-Miller Dwan Medical Center 1,880 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Duluth 1,701 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ethan Allen Service Center - Pomona CA 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-KS91 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2967-IL68 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renewal - 700 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.