School districts, elementary or secondary · Minnesota

Win-E-Mac School District 2609

Erskine, MN · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 runs at 426% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical School districts, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Win-E-Mac School District 2609: 6.0 TCR = 426% of School districts, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 safety composite

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2023

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 injury rate improved

Win-E-Mac School District 2609's TCR fell 1.0 from 8.6 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Erskine, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 426% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #1194/1589
  • PHOTO JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Win-E-Mac School District 2609 averages 6.0 TCR (426% of the School districts, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=7.6 · BLS 1.4

Where Win-E-Mac School District 2609 falls in its industry

3,374 School districts, elementary o establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1194 safest of 1589 School districts, elementary o employers in Minnesota.

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 (87 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Win-E-Mac School District 2609
Win-E-Mac School District 2609 (87 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Win-E-Mac School District 2609 has more employees than the School districts, elementary or secondar median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.6 2.5 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.4 5.6 2 1 0
2018 11.2 5.6 2 0 0
2017 8.6 8.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Erskine

3,374 School districts, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Erskine, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ella Baker 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR District Wide 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Elementary School 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LS Black 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minger Construction Companies Incorporated 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Roofing 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Company - Rochester, MN 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Win-E-Mac Schools 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erskine Agronomy Office 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vigen Construction- Erskine 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erskine Agronomy 18 FTE
NAT-TCR Distribution Center - Wells Street 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SWX Enterprises 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Oh - Fondorf Dr 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2109-Residence/Springhill Chicago 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE O'Halloran International 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE America's Thrift Store #5 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munson Electric 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Area Metro 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.