Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing · Minnesota

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse

Mankato, MN · ~161 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse: 6.7 TCR = 202% of Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse safety composite

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse: 4.8 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2021

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse's TCR rose 3.7 from 4.8 in 2020 to 8.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 202% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO WICHITA KS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WICHITA KS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse averages 6.7 TCR (202% of the Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse TCR series: 2020=4.8 · 2021=8.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse falls in its industry

516 Beverages, soft drink (includi establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Beverages, soft drink (includi employers in Minnesota.

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse (161 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse
Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse (161 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse has more employees than the Beverages, soft drink (including artific median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.5 7.9 14 0 0
2020 4.8 3.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · MN · Mankato

516 Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WICHITA KS 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swire Coca-Cola of Colorado Springs 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6874-68740011 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6975-1L06 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kerry Blue Earth 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSEVILLE MN PLANT 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Process Piping 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Nuance Solutions 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Culpeper Farmers' Cooperative, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Buena Vista Healthcare 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert J. Nickles, Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE WellCare Physicians Group 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Sterling Plant 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Lake Shore Drive 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camarero Race Trak Corporation 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.