Skilled nursing facilities · Mississippi
Wisteria Gardens
PEARL, MS · ~69 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 5.1
- Avg TCR
- 6.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Wisteria Gardens runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate — safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace — earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 5.1
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 6.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 15
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Wisteria Gardens's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 9 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Wisteria Gardens's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 6.5 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623110.
Where Wisteria Gardens falls in its industry
15,832 Skilled nursing facilities establishmentsSafer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.5.
Wisteria Gardens has an average TCR of 5.1, which is 78% of the industry average (6.5) for Skilled nursing facilities. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Wisteria Gardens
Wisteria Gardens operates an establishment with approximately 69 full-time equivalent workers in PEARL, MS, classified under the Skilled nursing facilities industry (NAICS 623110). Across 9 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 15 recordable injuries, 9 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 6.5 for Skilled nursing facilities, Wisteria Gardens's workforce experiences 78% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 9 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Wisteria Gardens as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Wisteria Gardens's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623110 — Skilled nursing facilities.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 105,430 hours worked = 1.90 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Wisteria Gardens (this establishment) | 5.06 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 9-year avg |
| Skilled nursing facilities industry avg | 6.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 623110 |
| Mississippi state avg (all industries) | 3.72 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Wisteria Gardens to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 5 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 3 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 6 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 6 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| 2022 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10.1 | 8.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Wisteria Gardens's reported OSHA injury record — strong versus its Skilled nursing facilities peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 78% of the Skilled nursing facilities benchmark, Wisteria Gardens reports fewer injuries than typical peers — still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Skilled nursing facilities sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wisteria Gardens's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Wisteria Gardens reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.