Textile products finishing · Pennsylvania

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc.

Shoemakersville, PA · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Textile products finishing workplace, earning a grade F.

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc.: 6.8 TCR = 207% of Textile products finishing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. safety composite

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2021

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. injury rate improved

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 6.7 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=16.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313310 · Shoemakersville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 207% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #16/17
  • PHOTO Swift Textile Metali…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Swift Textile Metalizing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. averages 6.8 TCR (207% of the Textile products finishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=16.6 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. falls in its industry

166 Textile products finishing establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Textile products finishing employers in Pennsylvania.

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc.
Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. (59 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Wolfe Dye and Bleach Works, Inc. has fewer employees than the Textile products finishing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2019 6.7 1.7 2 2 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 16.6 14.9 8 2 0
2016 6.7 5.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313310 · PA · Shoemakersville

166 Textile products finishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Shoemakersville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Swift Textile Metalizing 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Specialty Textiles Group 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OTC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA Location 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Pipersville, PA) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Creek Nurseries, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone Generating Station 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&A Homes, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Distribution Centers LLC-200 Logistics Drive 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Materion - Reading 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Materion - Shoemakersville 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoemakersville plant 115 FTE
NAT-TCR Metcalfe's- West 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Alta Equipment Company 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Contour 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pharmachem Laboratories LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Public Safety 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 90007870 General Dynamics 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ajax Tocco Madison Heights 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amarr Entrematic Shawnee 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.