Security system monitoring services · Minnesota

Wright Hennepin International Response Center

Rockford, MN · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Hennepin International Response Center runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Security system monitoring services workplace, earning a grade B.

Wright Hennepin International Response Center: 1.5 TCR = 59% of Security system monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Hennepin International Response Center safety composite

Wright Hennepin International Response Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wright Hennepin International Response Center held a steady TCR band

Wright Hennepin International Response Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=4.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Rockford, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Toepfer Security Corp.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toepfer Security Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright Hennepin International Response Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Hennepin International Response Center averages 1.5 TCR (59% of the Security system monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Hennepin International Response Center TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Wright Hennepin International Response Center falls in its industry

161 Security system monitoring ser establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Security system monitoring ser employers in Minnesota.

Wright Hennepin International Response Center (28 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Hennepin International Response Center
Wright Hennepin International Response Center (28 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Wright Hennepin International Response Center has fewer employees than the Security system monitoring services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · MN · Rockford

161 Security system monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in Rockford, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toepfer Security Corp. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisiana - 203 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seymour FS (SSS, CSS) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRE-CPIS-GREENVILLE,SC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shooting Star Native Seeds 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moore Calves 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worthington Public Utilities 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools (110) 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford High School (300) 88 FTE
NAT-TCR CMF Group Inc Michigan 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Process Equipment and Service Company 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Arc of New Jersey 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR QQE Summit LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE People For People Moses Lake Transportation 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milk Street Dairy, LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supermercados Morelos - La Union Corp 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Dispatch 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.