Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Minnesota

Wright Hennepin Security

Rockford, MN · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Hennepin Security runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade F.

Wright Hennepin Security: 8.8 TCR = 338% of Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Hennepin Security safety composite

Wright Hennepin Security scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wright Hennepin Security held a steady TCR band

Wright Hennepin Security's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.8 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.8 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=24.5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Rockford, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 338% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Security Sistems Ser…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Security Sistems Services (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright Hennepin Security in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Hennepin Security averages 8.8 TCR (338% of the Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Hennepin Security TCR series: 2019=4.8 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=24.5 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5 · BLS 2.6

Where Wright Hennepin Security falls in its industry

161 Alarm systems sales combined w establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Alarm systems sales combined w employers in Minnesota.

Wright Hennepin Security (23 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Hennepin Security
Wright Hennepin Security (23 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Wright Hennepin Security has fewer employees than the Alarm systems sales combined with instal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2021 24.5 24.5 3 2 0
2020 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · MN · Rockford

161 Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in Rockford, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Security Sistems Services 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonitrol Nevada 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smart Systems Technologies, Inc. 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smart Systems Technologies, Inc. (Tempe) 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools (110) 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford Elementary Schools 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockford High School (300) 88 FTE
NAT-TCR 1193 - Gaithersburg 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheriff Department 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR UPMC Lititz 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside - Rsc 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE L.D. Clark Company 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trebor USA Corp 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mike Woolf Farming LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet of Madera 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.