Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation · Tennessee

Wright Industrial Group, LLC

Charleston, TN · ~104 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright Industrial Group, LLC runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Wright Industrial Group, LLC: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright Industrial Group, LLC safety composite

Wright Industrial Group, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wright Industrial Group, LLC: 0.6 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Wright Industrial Group, LLC's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.6 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Charleston, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #9/22
  • PHOTO Trinity Door Systems
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trinity Door Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Wright Industrial Group, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright Industrial Group, LLC averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright Industrial Group, LLC TCR series: 2019=0.6 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Wright Industrial Group, LLC falls in its industry

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 22 Machinery and equipment, large employers in Tennessee.

Wright Industrial Group, LLC (104 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright Industrial Group, LLC
Wright Industrial Group, LLC (104 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Wright Industrial Group, LLC has more employees than the Machinery and equipment, large-scale, in median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.8 2 1 0
2023 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 2.1 6 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · TN · Charleston

1,138 Machinery and equipment, large-scale, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 17 employers in Charleston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trinity Door Systems 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Minneapolis 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Charleston 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Chicago Suburbs 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CableSouth Construction, LLC 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE FRANKLIN RD - CNR136 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richardson International 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premium Waters 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CHA2 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CHA2 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR WACKER Polysilicon North America 714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wright Brothers Construction Company, Inc. 406 FTE
NAT-TCR General Caulking Tampa 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PJ Mechanical Service & Maintenance 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 3946 Radiator Works 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR State of Indiana DCS Delaware County 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE AUGUSTA 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Fire Protection, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polk County Public Service, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwood Hills Care Center 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.