Press forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished · Massachusetts

Wyman-Gordon

North Grafton, MA · ~272 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wyman-Gordon runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Press forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished workplace, earning a grade B.

Wyman-Gordon: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Press forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wyman-Gordon safety composite

Wyman-Gordon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2018→2024

Wyman-Gordon injury rate improved

Wyman-Gordon's TCR fell 4.2 from 5.6 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332112 · North Grafton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Special Metals Dunkirk
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~272 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Special Metals Dunkirk (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Wyman-Gordon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wyman-Gordon averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Press forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Wyman-Gordon TCR series: 2018=5.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Wyman-Gordon falls in its industry

65 Press forgings made from purch establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Press forgings made from purch employers in Massachusetts.

Wyman-Gordon (272 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wyman-Gordon
Wyman-Gordon (272 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Wyman-Gordon has more employees than the Press forgings made from purchased nonfe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 4 0 0
2020 2.2 1.9 8 0 0
2019 4.8 2.7 18 0 0
2018 5.6 2.2 12 11 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332112 · MA · North Grafton

65 Press forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 8 employers in North Grafton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Special Metals Dunkirk 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schlosser Forge - Rancho Cucamonga 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyman Gordon Company 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyman Gordon Worcester 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Life Care Center of West Bridgewater 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Materials Solutions 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE 72011 272 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEST ROXBURY RIVERMOOR (MA50) 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR IDEXX Reference Labs 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Mills - North Grafton, MA 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTH GRAFTON, MA -DANA DIVISION 2 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primary Colors, Inc 36 FTE
NAT-TCR First Call Quality Services 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TORRANCE 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Un Central Missouri Starbucks 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unlimited Care, Inc. Bronx, NY 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Frischhertz Electric Co., Inc. 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gray Metal Products, Inc. 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ground Effects, LLC - 16-Mile Sterling Heights 272 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCI Powder Coatings 272 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.