Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Michigan

XALT Energy- Pontiac

Pontiac, MI · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

XALT Energy- Pontiac runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

XALT Energy- Pontiac: 0.8 TCR = 170% of Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

XALT Energy- Pontiac safety composite

XALT Energy- Pontiac scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

XALT Energy- Pontiac held a steady TCR band

XALT Energy- Pontiac's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Pontiac, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 170% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO AZ008
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AZ008 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

XALT Energy- Pontiac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows XALT Energy- Pontiac averages 0.8 TCR (170% of the Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

XALT Energy- Pontiac TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.5

Where XALT Energy- Pontiac falls in its industry

319 Physical science research and establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Physical science research and employers in Michigan.

XALT Energy- Pontiac (40 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate XALT Energy- Pontiac
XALT Energy- Pontiac (40 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

XALT Energy- Pontiac has fewer employees than the Physical science research and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · MI · Pontiac

319 Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AZ008 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jones Farm Campus 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Alsip Tech. Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janssen Research and Development San Diego 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan & Jerrys Pineview Greenhouse LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powertrain Headquaters 2,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #35 (Rochester, MN (South)) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J. F. Shea Construction, PA 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PolyOne Pasadena 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nextgen Systems LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE RTI Restoration Technology, Inc. Headquarters 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Dominion Distributors (Vending) 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.