Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines · Ohio
Yamada North America, Inc.
SOUTH CHARLESTON, OH · ~509 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.9
- Avg TCR
- 5.4
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Yamada North America, Inc. runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 5.4
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 106
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Yamada North America, Inc.'s OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 8 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Yamada North America, Inc.'s yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.4 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 336310.
Where Yamada North America, Inc. falls in its industry
233 Assembly line rebuilding of au establishmentsSafer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.
Yamada North America, Inc. has an average TCR of 2.9, which is 53% of the industry average (5.4) for Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines. This is better than average.
Safety Insights for Yamada North America, Inc.
Yamada North America, Inc. operates an establishment with approximately 509 full-time equivalent workers in SOUTH CHARLESTON, OH, classified under the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines industry (NAICS 336310). Across 8 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 106 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the B letter grade (Good Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 5.4 for Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines, Yamada North America, Inc.'s workforce experiences 53% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 8 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Yamada North America, Inc. as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Yamada North America, Inc.'s own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 336310 - Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 687,282 hours worked = 0.87 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada North America, Inc. (this establishment) | 2.85 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg |
| Connecting rods, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing industry avg | 5.40 | BLS IIF, NAICS 336310 |
| Ohio state avg (all industries) | 3.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Yamada North America, Inc. to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 8 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 13 reportable incidents · 13 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 20 reportable incidents · 20 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 25 reportable incidents · 25 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 25 reportable incidents · 25 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Yamada North America, Inc.'s reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 53% of the Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines benchmark, Yamada North America, Inc. reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Assembly line rebuilding of automotive and truck gasoline engines sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Yamada North America, Inc.'s safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Yamada North America, Inc. reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.