Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

Reflections Retirement Community

Lancaster, OH · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reflections Retirement Community runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Reflections Retirement Community: 1.6 TCR = 43% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reflections Retirement Community safety composite

Reflections Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Reflections Retirement Community: 0.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 5.99× in 2023

Reflections Retirement Community's TCR rose 9.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 5.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lancaster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 43% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #27/234
  • PHOTO Baptist Apartments
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baptist Apartments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Reflections Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reflections Retirement Community averages 1.6 TCR (43% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reflections Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=9.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Reflections Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 234 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Reflections Retirement Community (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reflections Retirement Community
Reflections Retirement Community (31 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Reflections Retirement Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.7 9.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Lancaster

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baptist Apartments 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cogir of Vallejo Hills 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Summer Place 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkview in Frisco 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Valley Ranch 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 5 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Hardcastle Specialties Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aim Integrated Logistics Inc. Hydro Cressona 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Northumberland Pa Plant 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Store 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yuma County Administration 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cif (Jble) 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE JM Huber Marblehead IL 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florence Mill 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.