Biomass electric power generation · California

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC

San Jose, CA · ~23 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC runs at 458% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biomass electric power generation workplace, earning a grade F.

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC: 5.5 TCR = 458% of Biomass electric power generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC safety composite

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2024

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC injury rate improved

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC's TCR fell 4.1 from 7.3 in 2018 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221117 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 458% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Rio Bravo Fresno
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rio Bravo Fresno (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC averages 5.5 TCR (458% of the Biomass electric power generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=4.1 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC falls in its industry

54 Biomass electric power generat establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Biomass electric power generat employers in California.

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC (23 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC
Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC (23 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 28 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Zero Waste Energy Development Company, LLC has fewer employees than the Biomass electric power generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2020 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221117 · CA · San Jose

54 Biomass electric power generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rio Bravo Fresno 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRP Franklin 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avista Kettle Falls 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Puente Hills Gas-to-Energy Facility 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Strathallan Hotel 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dawn Food Products - Houston Distribution 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock Lumber Company-Bridgton 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Intermountain Medical Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bonannos New York Pizzeria #310 MGM Dome 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.P. Weaver Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE WEL-Life at Spirit Lake 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04119 - WI Weyerhaeuser 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.