Engineering design services · Michigan

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc.

Northville, MI · ~650 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Engineering design services workplace, earning a grade B.

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 60% of Engineering design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. safety composite

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. held a steady TCR band

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2023 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.5 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Northville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.3 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #12/64
  • PHOTO SSOE Inc Hillsboro
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~650 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSOE Inc Hillsboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (60% of the Engineering design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. TCR series: 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 0.5

Where ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. falls in its industry

690 Engineering design services establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 64 Engineering design services employers in Michigan.

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. (650 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc.
ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. (650 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

ZF Chassis Components, LLC ZF North America, Inc. has more employees than the Engineering design services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · MI · Northville

690 Engineering design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 44 employers in Northville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSOE Inc Hillsboro 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NASA Kennedy US FL Kennedy Space Center FL FL979 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickliffe - 29801 Euclid Avenue 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fugro USA Marine, Inc. - Lafayette 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yanfeng Highland Park 650 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saginaw County Governmental Center 649 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANN+HUMMEL Portage 652 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8354_19001 648 FTE
CITY-NEAR ZF North America-Northville 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR 054 - Northville 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR HAWTHORN CENTER - DHHS 225 FTE
NAT-TCR Celanese LTD, Clear Lake 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR L3Harris Cincinnati Electronics 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AS-Murfreesboro Facility-00096 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylor Company 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE University 650 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-N-Gate Ok LLC 650 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.