Industry profile · NAICS 336413

Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 691 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

691
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
9,418
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
691
employers reporting
9,418
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing sector (NAICS 336413) encompasses 691 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 9,418 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 8 of 15
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Ducommun Monrovia Monrovia, CA B 1.7
Sylmar Sylmar, CA B 1.7
49 West Dudley Town Road Bloomfield, CT B 1.7
FPD Company Mcmurray, PA B 1.7
LMI - Everett MC Everett, WA B 1.7
NGAS-Y209 Cambridge, MA B 1.7
Pegasus Manufacturing Middletown, CT B 1.7
Supply Chain : Sterling, VA Sterling, VA B 1.7
Hartzell Propeller Prop Place Piqua, OH B 1.7
Aerometals Inc El Dorado Hills, CA B 1.7
Mico Machine Company La Grange, TX B 1.7
HoneywellTX06 Houston, TX B 1.7
Globe Engineering Company Wichita, KS A 1.6
Servotronics, Inc Elma, NY A 1.6
LMI - Catoosa Catoosa, OK A 1.6
GDC Technics - SAT San Antonio, TX A 1.6
GSE Dynamics, Inc. Hauppauge, NY A 1.6
BE Aerospace - Everett Everett, WA A 1.6
Kaman Aerospace Jacksonville, FL A 1.6
Lisi Aerospace Torrnace, CA A 1.6
Guardian Electric Manufacturing Woodstock, IL A 1.6
Ca160 Fmh Aerospace Irvine, CA A 1.6
Carson Helicopters, Inc. Perkasie, PA A 1.6
Triumph Geared Solutions Park City, UT A 1.6
Aerospace Dynamics International Valencia, CA A 1.6
Northstar Aerospace (Phoenix) 300 Building Phoenix, AZ A 1.6
Acutec Precision Aerospace, Inc. Saegertown Saegertown, PA A 1.6
Saint Gobain - American Seal and Engineering Orange, CT A 1.6
Radius Aerospace Fort Worth Fort Worth, TX A 1.6
Supply Chain : Rockford, IL Loves Park, IL A 1.6
NORDAM Interiors and Structures Tulsa, OK A 1.5
BE Aerospace - Tucson Tucson, AZ A 1.5
Frontier Electronic Systems Corp Stillwater, OK A 1.5
MAGSEAL Warren, RI A 1.5
BAM Inc. Knoxville, TN A 1.5
Saint-Gobain Aerospace- Ravenna Ravanna, OH A 1.5
Airframe Systems : Niles Niles, IL A 1.5
Layton Facility Layton, UT A 1.5
HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP Highpoint, NC A 1.5
United Rotorcraft - CO Englewood, CO A 1.5
Goodrich Corporation (Miami Gardens FL) Miami Gardens, FL A 1.5
FACC Solutions, Inc. Wichita, KS A 1.5
AerospaceYork York, NE A 1.5
Tornado Alley Turbo, Inc. Ada, OK A 1.5
Meggitt Defense Systems Inc. Irvine, CA A 1.4
Leggett & Platt Aeorspace - Middletown Middletown, CT A 1.4
Systems Sterling VA Sterling, VA A 1.4
ARC Technologies Amesbury, MA A 1.4
Thales Avionics Inc - Orlando warehouse Orlando, FL A 1.4
Meggitt (North Hollywood), INC. North Hollywood, CA A 1.4
← Prev Page 8 of 15 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.