Industry profile · NAICS 326220

Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 165 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

165
Employers
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,995
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing average 4.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
165
employers reporting
2,995
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing sector (NAICS 326220) encompasses 165 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,995 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.2 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Anderson Plant Anderson, SC D 5.0
Flexaust Company, Incorporated Warsaw, IN D 4.9
ContiTech Sun Prairie Sun Prairie, WI D 4.9
Fort Scott Fort Scott, KS D 4.6
Kuri Tec Manufacturing Williamsport, IN D 4.5
NewAge Industries Inc - Valley Road Warrington, PA D 4.5
Gates Galesburg Galesburg, IL D 4.5
Matex Hose Dothan, AL D 4.4
Habasit America Middletown Middletown, CT D 4.3
SaarGummi TN., Inc. Pulaski, TN D 4.1
Beltservice - Vancouver Vancouver, WA C 4.0
Fluid Connectors : Vero Beach Vero Beach, FL C 3.9
Superior Fire Hose Inc Pineville, NC C 3.9
Continental Marysville, OH C 3.9
Contitech Mount Pleasant Mount Pleasant, IA C 3.8
Danfoss Power Solutions II, LLC Newbern, TN C 3.8
Shipp Belting Co., LLC Waco, TX C 3.5
Minnesota Flexible Corporation So St Paul, MN C 3.5
Danfoss Power Solutions II LLC Forest City, NC C 3.4
Gates Corporation-Elizabethtown Elizabethtown, KY C 3.3
Yokohama Industries America Versailles, KY C 3.3
Middlesex Nc Middlesex, NC C 3.3
JGB Enterprises Inc Liverpool, NY C 3.3
CDF - 57 Armstrong Location Plymouth, MA C 3.2
ILPEA Industries - OEM/Miller Div. Aurora, OH C 3.2
Gates Corporation Elizabethtown, KY C 3.1
Gates Rubber Co Galesburg Galesburg, IL C 3.1
Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. Fort Worth, TX C 3.1
Fluid Connectors : Kennett Kennett, MO C 3.1
Kuriyama of America, Inc. Schaumburg, IL C 3.0
HCI New Albany, IN C 3.0
Gates Corporation Red Bay,AL Red Bay, AL C 3.0
Nichirin Tennssee INC. Lewisburg, TN C 3.0
Flexaust Company, Inc Las Vegas, NV C 3.0
Fenner Precision Polymers US- Manheim Manheim, PA C 2.9
GRT Rubber Technologies Paragould, AR C 2.9
Forest City Nc Forest City, NC C 2.9
Flexseals, Newnan, GA Newnan, GA C 2.8
CDF - Baltimore Baltimore, MD C 2.8
Fluid Routing Solutions Ocala Ocala, FL C 2.8
Bay Advanced Technologies Cleveland, OH C 2.8
Gates Mectrol Salem Salem, NH C 2.7
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions - Northborough Northborough, MA C 2.7
Trelleborg Sealing Solutions Northborough, MA C 2.7
Bi-State Rubber Inc. Fenton, MO B 2.6
Fluid Routing Solutions, Inc. Lexington, TN B 2.6
Gates Galesburg, IL B 2.6
Intralox LLC - Hammond Hammond, LA B 2.5
Fluid Connectors : Ravenna Ravenna, OH B 2.5
Gates Corporation Iola KS Iola, KS B 2.5
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.