Industry profile · NAICS 333249

Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 495 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

495
Employers
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,426
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing average 4.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
495
employers reporting
6,426
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing sector (NAICS 333249) encompasses 495 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,426 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Girton Manufacturing Co., Inc. Millville, PA D 5.5
Technic Equipment Division Pawtucket, RI D 5.4
21st Century Plastics Corporation Potterville, MI D 5.4
Corporate Office Huntington Beach, CA D 5.4
NU New Ulm, MN D 5.2
Marvel Manufacturing Company, Inc. Oshkosh, WI D 5.2
Canton, NC Canton, NC D 5.1
Afinitas- Columbus Location Columbus, OH D 5.1
Eastman Machine Company Buffalo, NY D 5.1
AmeriChem Systems Inc. Aurora, IL D 5.1
The M&R Companies Roselle, IL D 5.0
Bergkamp Inc. Salina, KS D 4.9
Raschig USA El Dorado East Plant El Dorado, KS D 4.9
Clean Air PCI, LLC Rome, GA D 4.8
SP Scientific - Stone Ridge, NY Stone Ridge, NY D 4.8
4Ram Polymers Chicago, IL D 4.8
Main Aurora, OH D 4.8
J C Steele and Sons Statesville, NC D 4.8
Providien Injection Molding Carlsbad, CA D 4.7
Pannier Glenshaw Glenshaw, PA D 4.7
Plastics Extrusion Machinery Tumwater, WA D 4.7
Burden Road Machesney Park, IL D 4.7
Black Bros. Co. Mendota, IL D 4.7
SencorpWhite Inc Hyannis, MA D 4.7
Granite Valley New London, WI D 4.6
San Diego PTF San Diego, CA D 4.6
Paget Equipment Company Marshfield, WI D 4.6
Clearly Clean Products, LLC. (2) Frackville, PA D 4.6
Morehouse-Cowles Chino, CA D 4.6
Sturtevant Inc. Hanover, MA D 4.5
Plastics Extrusion Machinery LLC Mcpherson, KS D 4.5
D&W Fine Pack Fort Calhoun, NE D 4.5
Horizon Manufacturing Group Lake Mills, WI D 4.5
Mauser Packaging Valparaiso, IN D 4.5
Machinery Division St. Charles, MO D 4.5
United Silicone Lancaster Lancaster, NY D 4.4
Erdman Automation Corporation Princeton, MN D 4.4
Dannar Hq Muncie, IN D 4.4
PFCH Charlotte, NC D 4.4
Innovative Plastics Molders, INC Vandalia, OH D 4.4
Ohio Magnetics, Inc. Maple Heights, OH D 4.3
Stratasys (P3) San Francisco, CA D 4.3
DL Manufacturing North Syracuse, NY D 4.3
3D Systems - Seattle Seattle, WA D 4.3
Cosmetic Specialties International Oxnard, CA D 4.3
Southwest Mold, Inc dba Seitz Torrington, CT D 4.2
Tuftco Corp TMD Chattanooga, TN D 4.2
Stratasys SDM (Wallace) Eden Prairie, MN D 4.2
ValTec, LLC Imlay City, MI D 4.1
Allied Dies, Inc. Chippewa Falls, WI D 4.1
← Prev Page 3 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.0 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.