Industry profile · NAICS 221320

Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system

Workplace injury rates across 437 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

437
Employers
5.5
Avg TCR
1.2
BLS benchmark
6,559
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system average 5.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 1.2.

5.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
1.2
BLS national benchmark
437
employers reporting
6,559
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system Safety Data Reveals

The Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system sector (NAICS 221320) encompasses 437 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,559 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 1.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.5 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Wastewater Enterprise San Francisco, CA F 7.8
Field's Point Wastewater Treatment Facility Providence, RI F 7.8
Four Rivers Sanitation Authority Rockford, IL F 7.8
City and County of Honolulu - Department of Environmental Services Kapolei, HI F 7.7
Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Honolulu, HI F 7.7
Sewer Department - East/West Treatment Plants Joliet, IL F 7.6
Calumet WRP Chicago, IL F 7.6
Waste Water Treatment Island Facility Lake Havasu City, AZ F 7.4
KBX Golden, LLC Kennett Square, PA F 7.4
Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant San Diego, CA F 7.4
Thorn Creek Basin Sanitary District Chicago Heights, IL F 7.4
Opequon Water Reclamation Facility Winchester, VA F 7.2
Wakulla Crawfordville, FL F 7.1
Dillman Wastewater Treatment Plant Bloomington, IN F 7.0
Muddy Creek Wastewater Winston-Salem, NC F 7.0
OCSD Plant 2 Huntington Beach, CA F 7.0
H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Gulfport O&M Gulfport, MS F 7.0
Kankakee River Metropolitan Agency Kankakee, IL F 7.0
West Valley Sanitation District Campbell, CA F 7.0
Operations and Maintenance Flint, MI F 7.0
Public Works - Waste Water Management Juneau, AK F 6.9
WVWA Roanoke Regional Water Pollution Control Plant Roanoke, VA F 6.9
Fresno WasteWater Division Fresno, CA F 6.9
MOC 2 - Public Utilities San Diego, CA F 6.9
Wastewater Treatment Facility Smithfield, NC F 6.8
Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant Cerritos, CA F 6.8
Fountain Hills Sanitary District Fountain Hills, AZ F 6.8
Huntington Sanitary Board Huntington, WV F 6.7
Sanitation District Agency Elk Grove, CA F 6.7
Stickney Water Reclamation Plant Cicero, IL F 6.7
O'Brien WRP Skokie, IL F 6.5
Shelley'S Environmental Systems Zellwood, FL F 6.5
Public Works El Mirage, AZ F 6.4
North Charleston Sewer District Charleston, SC F 6.4
Greater Peoria Sanitary District Peoria, IL F 6.3
Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant Lynchburg, VA F 6.3
Nebraska Region Omaha, NE F 6.3
Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Carson, CA F 6.3
Apache Junction Sewer District Apache Junction, AZ F 6.2
Lakehaven Water and Sewer District Federal Way, WA F 6.1
Ojai Valley Sanitary District Ojai, CA F 6.1
CMUD-Water Charlotte, NC F 6.1
West Basin El Segundo, CA F 6.1
Hamilton County WWTA (Water & Wastewater Treatment Authority) Chattanooga, TN F 6.0
Warren Facility Water Reclamation Plant Carson, CA F 6.0
Newport RI Newport, RI F 6.0
Waste Water Treatment Plant Council Bluffs, IA F 5.9
Wastewater Treatement Plant Florence, OR F 5.9
WPCA Windsor Locks, CT F 5.9
Stickney WRP Cicero, IL F 5.9
← Prev Page 3 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system?

This sector averages 5.5 against a BLS benchmark of 1.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.