Industry profile · NAICS 485111

Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)

Workplace injury rates across 386 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

386
Employers
6.8
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
19,501
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) average 6.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

6.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
386
employers reporting
19,501
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) Safety Data Reveals

The Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) sector (NAICS 485111) encompasses 386 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 19,501 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.8 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Bend, OR Bend, OR F 12.2
Memphis Area Transit Memphis, TN F 12.1
Metro Transit Transfer Road & Police Department St Paul, MN F 12.1
4102 Track Maintenance Chicago, IL F 12.0
803 Maintenance Urbana, IL F 12.0
TriMet Rose Quarter Maintenance Portland, OR F 12.0
4071 Sheet Metal Maintenance Chicago, IL F 11.9
1953-1111 Chicago, IL F 11.8
Streetcar Portland, OR F 11.8
2221 Red Line N Scheduled Transit Operations Chicago, IL F 11.8
1953-1121 Chicago, IL F 11.8
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - Cerone Division San Jose, CA F 11.6
Division 24 Monrovia, CA F 11.5
Bladensburg Facility Washington, DC F 11.5
Metro Transit Transfer Road St Paul, MN F 11.5
4131 Power Maintenance Chicago, IL F 11.4
Valley Transit District Derby, CT F 11.4
Northern Bus Facility Washington, DC F 11.3
1111 103rd St Scheduled Transit Operations Chicago, IL F 11.2
1953-1342 Chicago, IL F 11.2
1953-2242 Forest Park, IL F 11.1
Portland Streetcar Portland, OR F 11.1
2224 98th Street Maintenance Chicago, IL F 11.0
Omnitrans San Bernardino, CA F 11.0
1953-1343 Chicago, IL F 11.0
1953-2252 Chicago, IL F 10.9
Morehead, Ky - Industry Rd Morehead, KY F 10.8
2211 Kimball Maintenance Chicago, IL F 10.8
2231 Lake Harlem Scheduled Transit Operations Oak Park, IL F 10.5
Division 22 Lawndale, CA F 10.4
Division 14 Santa Monica, CA F 10.4
4092 Machinists Chicago, IL F 10.4
4125 Ironworkers Chicago, IL F 10.3
1953-1131 Chicago, IL F 10.3
1151 Kedzie Scheduled Transit Operations Chicago, IL F 10.3
Western Bus Facility Washington, DC F 10.2
1953-2148 Chicago, IL F 10.2
1953-1162 Chicago, IL F 10.1
1953-1161 Chicago, IL F 10.1
1953-4131 Chicago, IL F 10.0
Division 2 Los Angeles, CA F 10.0
1161 Chicago Scheduled Transit Operations Chicago, IL F 9.9
Division 10 Los Angeles, CA F 9.9
Division 21 Los Angeles, CA F 9.9
Birmingham, AL - Shades Creek Birmingham, AL F 9.9
Powell Maintenance Building Portland, OR F 9.8
Circuit Transit Inc- San Diego San Diego, CA F 9.8
Powell Operations - Operators Portland, OR F 9.8
1953-2232 Chicago, IL F 9.8
City Transit Management, Inc Lubbock, TX F 9.8
← Prev Page 2 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination)?

This sector averages 6.8 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.