Industry profile · NAICS 237990

Earth retention system construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,045 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,045
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
7,463
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Earth retention system construction average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,045
employers reporting
7,463
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Earth retention system construction Safety Data Reveals

The Earth retention system construction sector (NAICS 237990) encompasses 1,045 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,463 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Earth retention system construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 28
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Stacy and Witbeck, Inc. - Pikes Peak Cog Railway Manitou Springs, CO F 25.6
Main Office Orange Park, FL F 23.5
Greek Peak Mountain Resort Cortland, NY F 23.1
BMI NW Division Ferndale, WA F 21.1
Martin Docks, Inc. Gainesville, GA F 20.3
Scofield Marine Contractors & Engineers, LLC Egg Harbor Township, NJ F 19.8
Stokes Marine, Inc Fort Myers, FL F 18.1
RJ Gorman Marine Construction Panama City, FL F 18.0
City of Rosemount Public Works Rosemount, MN F 17.4
Hdd Inc Tallassee, AL F 17.3
East Bay Regional Park Districtd Oakland, CA F 16.5
Maricorp US Shell Knob, MO F 15.6
Sunflower Enterprises Dubuque, IA F 15.3
Greg Orick II Marine Construction Inc. Naples, FL F 15.0
Summerset Marine Construction Whitewater, WI F 14.3
Rock Supremacy LLC Bend, OR F 13.8
Cen-Tex Marine Fabricators, Inc. Smithville, TX F 13.4
Locust Point Marine Terminal Baltimore, MD F 13.1
Honc Enterprises Inc. dba Honc Marine Contracting Cape Coral, FL F 12.7
Honc Docks & Lifts, INC Cape Coral, FL F 12.1
Southland Mole JV Kaneohe, HI F 12.0
Suulutaaq, Inc. (OR) Eugene, OR F 11.9
Public Works- Stormwater Hampton, VA F 11.7
Main Office Gainesville, GA F 11.4
DPW Farmington Hills, MI F 11.1
Youngs Communications Co Inc Melbourne, FL F 10.9
Foertsch Construction Co. Inc, Lamar, IN F 10.9
Altair Enviromental Group Orlando, FL F 10.8
Newt Marine Service Dubuque, IA F 10.7
McDowell Mountain Golf Club Scottsdale, AZ F 10.5
Summit Erosion Control San Diego, CA F 10.2
The Wall Portland, OR F 10.1
Southwest Division Dixon, CA F 10.1
EDGE Contracting, Inc. Golden, CO F 9.6
Hayward Construction Group, LLC Jacksonville, FL F 9.3
Parks Department Owatonna, MN F 9.1
Airway Heights Airway Heights, WA F 8.6
Angwin Angwin, CA F 8.5
Geovert Broomfield, CO F 8.4
BMI SW Division Dixon, CA F 8.4
Timber Division Castle Hayne, NC F 8.4
Railroad Construction Co., Inc. -Con Edison, NY Paterson, NJ F 8.4
Homeport Long Beach, CA F 8.0
Murray Logan Construction, Inc. West Palm Beach, FL F 7.8
Guymann Construction of Fl, Inc Cape Coral, FL F 7.8
Veterans Range Solutions, LLC Fredericksburg, VA F 7.8
DACO San Jose, CA F 7.7
Rebar International, Inc. Edgewood, WA F 7.6
Sunline Civil Construction Inc Palm City, FL F 7.5
Williamson & Sons Marine Construction, Inc Cape Coral, FL F 7.5
Page 1 of 28 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Earth retention system construction?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.