Industry profile · NAICS 237990

Earth retention system construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,045 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,045
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
7,463
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Earth retention system construction average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,045
employers reporting
7,463
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Earth retention system construction Safety Data Reveals

The Earth retention system construction sector (NAICS 237990) encompasses 1,045 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,463 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Earth retention system construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 12 of 28
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
SJ Hamill Construction Charleston, SC A 1.2
Acme Construction Co Inc Glenwillow, OH A 1.2
Patriot Industries, LLC Port Allen, LA A 1.2
SAPPI Fine Paper/Hinckley Hinckley, ME A 1.2
Purple Line 2 Project Los Angeles, CA A 1.2
Russell Marine LLC Channelview, TX A 1.1
Stacy and Witbeck/Kiewit/Hoffman, A Joint Venture - L200 Shoreline, WA A 1.1
Online Directional Boring Houston, TX A 1.1
Invista Longview TX Longview, TX A 1.1
G & R Mineral Services Birmingham, AL A 1.1
Houston Main Office Houston, TX A 1.1
Calaveras Dam Replacement Project Fremont, CA A 1.1
Throgs Neck Bridge Dehumidification System Bronx, NY A 1.1
Hardman Construction Ludington, MI A 1.1
Maggiora & Ghilotti, Inc. San Rafael, CA A 1.1
Bortunco, LLC Houston, TX A 1.1
Hoover Construction Company Virginia, MN A 1.1
Herzog Technologies, Inc. - HWR, A Joint Venture Vero Beach, FL A 1.1
ASI Construction, LLC Mt. Morris, PA A 1.1
Turner at ARLANXEO Performance Elastomer Orange TX Orange, TX A 1.1
Geostabilization International LLC Commerce City, CO A 1.1
Turner at Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge LA Baton Rouge, LA A 1.0
Mechanical Construction Services, Inc. Newark, AR A 1.0
108000 - Lima Wharf H2O Guam JV Santa Rita, GU A 1.0
Michels Directional Crossings- Brownsville Brownsville, WI A 1.0
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Oakbrook, IL A 1.0
5523_12243 Wilmington, NC A 1.0
PNSY Kittery, ME A 1.0
Alpha Railroad & Piling, LLC Minden, LA A 1.0
FHR Pine Bend Rosemount, MN A 1.0
Corporate Essex, CT A 1.0
Trans Ash, Inc. - Roxboro Roxboro, NC A 1.0
D.H.R. Construction, Inc. American Canyon, CA A 1.0
Environmental Allies Houston, TX A 1.0
Turner at Cabot Corporation Franklin LA Franklin, LA A 1.0
North Star Construction and Engineering, Inc. Yuba City, CA A 1.0
103244 - PRS Riverwalk Savannah, GA A 1.0
Meyer Contracting Inc. Maple Grove, MN A 1.0
Civil Solutions Associates Inc. Cincinnati, OH A 1.0
105082 - DW Gross Reservoir Expansion CM/GC Nederland, CO A 1.0
ZA Construction - LA Minden, LA A 1.0
Turner at AdvanSix Frankford PA Philadelphia, PA A 1.0
Humboldt Bay Power Plant Eureka, CA A 1.0
Ballard - Southeast Bradenton, FL A 1.0
Michels Marine a division of Michels Construction, Inc-WI-Lomira Lomira, WI A 1.0
Patton-Tully Marine, LLC Memphis, TN A 0.9
The Mor Sports Group Estero, FL A 0.9
Excavating Mishawaka, IN A 0.9
Cianbro Equipment LLC Pittsfield, ME A 0.9
Progress Energy HYCO Semora, NC A 0.9
← Prev Page 12 of 28 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Earth retention system construction?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.