Industry profile · NAICS 237990

Earth retention system construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,045 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,045
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
7,463
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Earth retention system construction average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,045
employers reporting
7,463
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Earth retention system construction Safety Data Reveals

The Earth retention system construction sector (NAICS 237990) encompasses 1,045 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 7,463 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Earth retention system construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 11 of 28
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Western Marine Construction Inc Seattle, WA A 1.3
Dredge America, Inc. Kansas City, MO A 1.3
Holland LP Crete, IL A 1.3
Laney (Total) Waller, TX A 1.3
Cooper Rail Service, Inc. Huntingburg, IN A 1.3
Hampden Bridges Hampden, ME A 1.3
Lone Star Railroad Contractors, Inc. Ennis, TX A 1.3
Stacy and Witbeck/Sundt, A Joint Venture - Gilbert Road LRT Extension Mesa, AZ A 1.3
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company LLC Oak Brook, IL A 1.3
Maintenance Division Decatur AL Decatur, AL A 1.3
Honolulu Rail Tranisit Project Irvine, CA A 1.3
Turner at Solvay Chemicals Inc. La Porte TX La Porte, TX A 1.3
Barnard Construction 282 Gallatin, TN A 1.3
Mid-Coast Transit Constructors - Mid-Coast LRT Extension San Diego, CA A 1.3
Nicholson Construction Company Canonsburg, PA A 1.3
LB Foster Rail Technologies, Inc (Field Services) Pittsburgh, PA A 1.3
Leick Construction Inc Glenwood, IA A 1.3
US Trackworks, LLC Wayland, MI A 1.3
Williams Tunnel Industrirs, Inc. St. Louis, MO A 1.3
Archer Western/Herzog, a Joint Venture - Tex Rail North Richland Hills, TX A 1.3
Herzog Contracting Corp. - Silverline Carrolton, TX A 1.3
The Dutra Group San Rafael, CA A 1.3
North Hero-Grand Isle Drawbrid Grand Isle, VT A 1.3
Marathon Catlettsburg Catlettsburg, KY A 1.3
RailWorks Transit, Inc. E. Farmingdale, NY A 1.3
So. California Santa Fe Springs, CA A 1.3
Solvay Chemicals Inc La Porte TX La Porte, TX A 1.2
GUBMK Constructors - TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant West Paducah, KY A 1.2
North Wind Construction IDF Idaho Falls, ID A 1.2
Jim Dobbas, Inc. Newcastle, CA A 1.2
Pinto Buffalo, NY A 1.2
Lynnhaven Marine and Dock, Inc. Suffolk, VA A 1.2
Herzog Technologies, Inc. - SunRail Sanford, FL A 1.2
Hitachi Rail (Boston) Newton, MA A 1.2
C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC Columbus, OH A 1.2
Turner at Huntsman International Port Neches TX Port Neches, TX A 1.2
Turner at Shell Chemical LP Saraland AL Mobile, AL A 1.2
Glover Construction Co. Pleasant Hill, NC A 1.2
Foertsch Contracting LLC Lamar, IN A 1.2
Tranco Industrial Services, Inc. Burns Harbor, IN A 1.2
Main Office Thibodaux, LA A 1.2
Turner at NOVA Olefins LLC Geismar LA Geismar, LA A 1.2
Ballard - Mid-Atlantic Baltimore, MA A 1.2
BRH Garver Construction Houston, TX A 1.2
SumCo Eco-Contracting, LLC Peabody, MA A 1.2
Bencor Frisco, TX A 1.2
LSAM Pan Line H Expansion Decatur, AL A 1.2
Skanska ECCO III JV / Harmon Yard Stage 2 90007100 Croton on Hudson, NY A 1.2
David W. White & Son, Inc Bow, NH A 1.2
Chicago Minooka, IL A 1.2
← Prev Page 11 of 28 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Earth retention system construction?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.