Industry profile · NAICS 541330

Engineering services

Workplace injury rates across 1,054 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,054
Employers
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
4,629
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Engineering services average 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 3.8 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

1.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
1,054
employers reporting
4,629
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Engineering services Safety Data Reveals

The Engineering services sector (NAICS 541330) encompasses 1,054 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,629 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Engineering services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 15 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Uni-Systems Engineering Plymouth, MN C 0.0
ESPA Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
Aircraft Systems and Manufacturing, a JANA Company Universal City, TX C 0.0
Fugro USA Land - Austin Austin, TX C 0.0
Fugro USA Land - Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
Fugro USA Land - Frederick Frederick, MD C 0.0
Fugro USA Land - Ventura Ventura, CA C 0.0
Fugro USA Land - Walnut Creek Walnut Creek, CA C 0.0
Carley Corporation Orlando, FL C 0.0
Optimum Energy Design LLC Anaheim, CA C 0.0
Hamilton, NJ Hamilton, NJ C 0.0
Outlaw Engineering, Inc Roosevelt, UT C 0.0
ES Alpharetta GA Alpharetta, GA C 0.0
ES Boise ID Boise, ID C 0.0
ES Fairview Heights IL Fairview Heights, IL C 0.0
ES Houston TX Houston, TX C 0.0
ES King of Prussia PA King of Prussia, PA C 0.0
ES Lewis Center OH Lewis Center, OH C 0.0
ES Plymouth MI Plymouth, MI C 0.0
Mymic, LLC Virginia Beach, VA C 0.0
EnergyLink Tulsa, OK C 0.0
Burrow Global, LLC. Beaumont, TX C 0.0
SEH - Minnetonka Minnetonka, MN C 0.0
SEH - Rochester Rochester, MN C 0.0
Corporate Office Middleburg Heights, OH C 0.0
Paciv-USA, LLC Indianapolis, IN C 0.0
Chantilly HQ Chantilly, VA C 0.0
Delta Dc Washington, DC C 0.0
BMES - Arkansas Springdale, AR C 0.0
Emerge Engineering & Wiring LLC Atlanta, GA C 0.0
EVS - Eden Prairie Eden Prarie, MN C 0.0
CPI Satcom & Antenna Technologies Inc. San Jose, CA C 0.0
Structural Integrity Associates, Inc. Huntersville, NC C 0.0
IB3 Global Solutions Oak Ridge, TN C 0.0
Fluid Quip Technologies Cedar Rapids, IA C 0.0
CAM Integrated Solutions Houston, TX C 0.0
Rani Engineering, LLC Minneapolis, MN C 0.0
HOTUD-Montgomery Montgomery, TX C 0.0
Danmare Group, Inc. Otsego, MN C 0.0
Paragon Space Development Corp Britannia Dr. Location Tucson, AZ C 0.0
Biomechanical Research and Testing Long Beach, CA C 0.0
Scientific Analysis Inc. Dallas, TX C 0.0
WEXCO International, LLC. El Segundo, CA C 0.0
Walsh Engineering & Production, Inc Aztec, NM C 0.0
B09N Dearborn, MI C 0.0
Doosan GridTech, Inc Seattle, WA C 0.0
Vineyard Offshore LLC Boston, MA C 0.0
R&L Engineering, Inc. Albany, GA C 0.0
UTS Engineering, LLC. Bedford, IN C 0.0
Summit Engineering, Inc. Lexington, KY C 0.0
← Prev Page 15 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Engineering services?

This sector averages 1.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.