Industry profile · NAICS 541330

Engineering services

Workplace injury rates across 1,054 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,054
Employers
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
4,629
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Engineering services average 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 3.8 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

1.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
1,054
employers reporting
4,629
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Engineering services Safety Data Reveals

The Engineering services sector (NAICS 541330) encompasses 1,054 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,629 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Engineering services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 16 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
CBJ Engineering Juneau, AK C 0.0
PGH Wong Engineering, Inc. San Francisco, CA C 0.0
Bluewater Civil Design Greenville, SC C 0.0
Johns Creek, GA Johns Creek, GA C 0.0
Progressive Design, Inc Midlothian, VA C 0.0
United E&C Mount Laurel Office Mount Laurel, NJ C 0.0
United E&C Denver Office Greenwood Village, CO C 0.0
United E&C Charlotte Office Charlotte, NC C 0.0
ASSETT Manassas, VA C 0.0
Shactee Engineering LLC Woodridge, IL C 0.0
CSS Cedar Park, TX C 0.0
Lake Superior Consulting (Canonsburg Office) Canonsburg, PA C 0.0
CREG Tulsa Tulsa, OK C 0.0
Jaktool LLC Cranbury, NJ C 0.0
Melrose Taiban, NM C 0.0
Bell Fourche Belle Fourche, SD C 0.0
UtilityEngineering, LLC Raleigh, NC C 0.0
Raw Resources LLC. Princeton, WV C 0.0
CrossRoad Engineers, PC Beech Grove, IN C 0.0
Rj Ruiz and Associates Inc DBA Ruiz Miami, FL C 0.0
Maryland Heights Technical Center Maryland Heights, MO C 0.0
VOITH MERI Environmental Solutions Appleton, WI C 0.0
Draper St. Petersburg, FL C 0.0
Construction Wasilla, AK C 0.0
Axis Engineering Group, LLC Perrysburg, OH C 0.0
Chemical & Industrial Engineering, Inc Louisville, KY C 0.0
HQ Peabody, MA C 0.0
DDS Engineering & Surveying, LLP W Henrietta, NY C 0.0
GRL Engineers, Inc. Solon, OH C 0.0
Andrews Cooper Technology, LLC Bothell Bothell, WA C 0.0
Andrews Cooper Technology, LLC Lake Oswego Lake Oswego, OR C 0.0
Metro Engineering Solutions, LLC. Livonia, MI C 0.0
Berry Global- Evansville, IN ESS Evansville, IN C 0.0
Carlson McCain - Plymouth Plymouth, MN C 0.0
Quake Global INc San Diego, CA C 0.0
Detroit Technical Center Van Buren Township, MI C 0.0
Southern California Office Carlsbad, CA C 0.0
MBK Engineers Sacramento, CA C 0.0
Air-Cure, Inc. Coon Rapids, MN C 0.0
KP Shaw, LLC Tyler, TX C 0.0
McKinstry Viridis LLC Seattle, WA C 0.0
Amped I LLC Chicago, IL C 0.0
Signal South LLC Jacksonville, FL C 0.0
TransCore - T0356 - Nashville Nashville, TN C 0.0
TransCore - T0802 - Atlanta Peachtree Corners, GA C 0.0
CAES Systems LLC - Colorado Springs Colorado Springs, CO C 0.0
Katmai Integrated Solutions, LLC Anchorage, AK C 0.0
Imdex Technology USA, LLC San Luis Obispo, CA C 0.0
Martin Technical Inc. Louisville, CO C 0.0
TMEIC Corporation Americas Roanoke, VA C 0.0
← Prev Page 16 of 23 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Engineering services?

This sector averages 1.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.