Industry profile · NAICS 325199

Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 647 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

647
Employers
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,030
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing average 2.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
647
employers reporting
4,030
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing sector (NAICS 325199) encompasses 647 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,030 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 14
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Sergeant Bluff Methyl Ester Sergeant Bluff, IA D 4.9
Lamberti Synthesis USA, Inc. Chattanooga, TN D 4.8
Fulcrum Biofuels Sparks, NV D 4.8
Innospec Active Chemicals, High Point High Point, NC D 4.8
PMC Biogenix Memphis, TN D 4.8
Boulder Scientific Company Mead, CO D 4.8
World Energy Harrisburg Camp Hill, PA D 4.7
Lanxess Greensboro Greensboro, NC D 4.7
King Industries Norwalk, CT D 4.7
Impact Nano LLC. Orange, MA D 4.7
Solugen, Inc. Houston, TX D 4.6
Polyventive LLC Dalton South Dalton, GA D 4.6
Novozymes Franklinton Franklinton, NC D 4.6
Peter Cremer North America - ST Cincinnati, OH D 4.6
Valtris Specialty Chemicals Cleveland, OH D 4.5
Custom Synthesis, LLC Anderson, SC D 4.5
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Niagara Falls, NY D 4.5
Heraeus Precious Metals North America Daychem, LLC Vandalia, OH D 4.5
Evonik Mapleton Mapleton, IL D 4.4
King Industries Norwalk Norwalk, CT D 4.4
IFF Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville, FL D 4.4
Heraeus Epurio LLC Vandalia, OH D 4.4
KMCO Crosby, TX D 4.4
Givaudan Cincinnati, OH D 4.4
Bayport Chemical Plant Pasadena, TX D 4.3
Enviro Tech Chemical Modesto, CA D 4.3
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - West Coast Operations San Diego, CA D 4.3
Coating and Converting Technologies Philadelphia, PA D 4.3
allnex USA Inc. Kalamazoo, MI D 4.3
World Energy Rome LLC Rome, GA D 4.3
Fedchem Bethlehem Bethlehem, PA D 4.2
Air Liquide Advanced Materials - PA2 Mount Bethel, PA D 4.2
Memphis Plant Memphis, TN D 4.2
BWAY Corporation Leominster, MA D 4.2
Phase Change Solutions - Pritchard Asheboro, NC D 4.1
FUJIFILM WAKO Cape Charles Cape Charles, VA D 4.1
STL Dekalb St. Louis, MO D 4.0
Oahu Honolulu, HI D 4.0
Veltek Associates, Inc. Malvern, PA C 3.9
Nova Molecular Technologies, Inc Pasadena, TX C 3.9
Fleurchem, Inc. Middletown, NY C 3.8
FAR Research, Inc. (dba FAR Chemical, Inc.) Palm Bay, FL C 3.8
Particle Size Technology, Inc Quakertown, PA C 3.8
Cht USA Inc Cassopolis, MI C 3.8
FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals U.S.A. Corporation Richmond, VA C 3.8
Manufacturing East Stroudsburg, PA C 3.7
Primary Products Ingredients Americas, LLC Duluth, MN C 3.7
MilliporeSigma - Dekalb St. Louis, MO C 3.7
Cyalume Technologies, Inc. West Springfield, MA C 3.6
REG Madison, LLC Deforest, WI C 3.6
← Prev Page 2 of 14 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.