Industry profile · NAICS 561210

Facilities (except computer operation) support services

Workplace injury rates across 1,045 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,045
Employers
3.8
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
13,402
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Facilities (except computer operation) support services average 3.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
1,045
employers reporting
13,402
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Facilities (except computer operation) support services Safety Data Reveals

The Facilities (except computer operation) support services sector (NAICS 561210) encompasses 1,045 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 13,402 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.8 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Facilities (except computer operation) support services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 10 of 24
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Sp-Sacred Heart Hosp Pensacola, FL C 2.3
CBRE - American Red Cross Washington, DC C 2.3
Cbre - Asml San Diego, CA C 2.3
CFM Ft. Sill (OKSIL2) Fort Sill, OK C 2.3
Tigua Facility Services Inc. El Paso, TX C 2.3
Sodexo at Nmsu Fm Services Las Cruces, NM C 2.2
Maxwell BOS Maxwell Afb, AL C 2.2
SODEXO AT HOBART and WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGE Geneva, NY C 2.2
Sodexo at Cp Chemical Gaithersburg, MD C 2.2
APS-3 Goose Creek, SC C 2.2
PaycheckGA, LLC Tallahassee, FL C 2.2
The Building People Leesburg, VA C 2.2
Sodexo at Rockford University Fm Rockford, IL C 2.2
Fort Polk Facilities Support Services Fort Polk, LA C 2.2
88th Medical Group Wright Patterson AFB O&M Wright Patterson Afb, OH C 2.2
Vectrus Maxwell Afb, AL C 2.2
CTC - Company Gadsden, AL C 2.1
Atlanta - Lang Tucker, GA C 2.1
Sodexo at Bethune Cookman Fm Admin Daytona Beach, FL C 2.1
Facility Services Management, Inc. Clarksville, TN C 2.1
Los Angeles Simi Valley, CA C 2.1
Dms - Goodfellow Goodfellow Afb, TX C 2.1
278 Fort McCoy LRC North Kansas City, MO C 2.1
DPW Fort Gregg-Adams Fort Lee, VA C 2.1
LA AFB Facility Maintenance El Segundo, CA C 2.1
Janco FS3 LLC dba Velociti Services Atlanta, GA C 2.1
KVAT Refrigeration #117- Knoxville Knoxville, TN C 2.1
OU Medical Center PT Oklahoma City, OK B 2.0
Mcincr - Mcb Quantico Quantico, VA B 2.0
Facilities Performance Group-LLC Hernando, MS B 2.0
Nasa Armstrong Edwards, CA B 2.0
Nta Frcsw Naval Base San Diego, CA B 2.0
Sodexo at Lake Forest Academy Lake Forest, IL B 2.0
Cherry Point North Kansas City, MO B 2.0
Sp-Bay Med Ctr Panama City, FL B 2.0
Sodexo at Illinois Math & Science Academ Aurora, IL B 2.0
Sodexo at Huntington University-Habecker Huntington, IN B 2.0
RSSII Las Vegas, NV B 2.0
Deployed Global Solutions Rome, NY B 1.9
MS - Columbus, GA - 1COGA Columbus, GA B 1.9
US&S Greenville, SC B 1.9
Chicago Naperville, IL B 1.9
SpecPro Environmental Services LLC Oak Ridge, TN B 1.9
Sodexo at Pfizer Kalamazoo Janitorial Kalamazoo, MI B 1.9
Technica LLC - DLA GDEC Charleston, SC B 1.9
Sodexo at Zna Zurich Hq Cafe Schaumburg, IL B 1.9
5619 B Jaxville Jacksonville, FL B 1.9
Piedmont Augusta-Fm Augusta, GA B 1.9
Shell WCK F JA Houston, TX B 1.9
St Elizabeths Washington, DC B 1.9
← Prev Page 10 of 24 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Facilities (except computer operation) support services?

This sector averages 3.8 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.