Industry profile · NAICS 333996

Fluid power motors manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 77 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 74 establishments with a credible rate.

77
Employers
2.9
Avg TCR (rated)
3.3
BLS benchmark
960
Injuries (all)

TCR, interpreted

About average

2.9 avg TCR

The industry picture

The 74 rated employers in Fluid power motors manufacturing average 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.9
avg TCR · rated subset
3.3
BLS national benchmark
74
rated employers
960
recordable injuries (all)

ITA inventory (77) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

Fluid power motors manufacturing injury rate, 2020–2024

Industry-average TCR has risen across this span (1.5 → 2.0) · NAICS 333996

1.41.61.822.22.42.6 20202021202220232024 2.05
OSHA ITA employer_yearly, 2020-2024 · establishments with >=200,000 hours worked and a credible TCR each year (23 in the latest year shown)

What Fluid power motors manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fluid power motors manufacturing sector (NAICS 333996) encompasses 77 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 960 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 74 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.9 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fluid power motors manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
EmployerLocationGradeAvg TCR
Omahaline HydraulicsNorth Sioux City, SDF10.3
Metro Machine & Engineering Corp.Eden Prairie, MNF9.5
Energy Recovery - TracyTracy, CAF9.4
Tark, Inc. - DaytonMiamisburg, OHF7.3
Energy Recovery Inc.San Leandro, CAD6.0
Bucher Hydraulics, Inc. Grand Rapids, MIGrand Rapids, MID6.0
Concentric RockfordRockford, ILD5.5
Delavan Ag Pumps IncMinneapolis, MND5.5
HYDAC Cylinder DivisionBirmingham, ALD5.4
Energy Recovery - KatyKaty, TXD5.3
Bucher Hydraulics, Inc. Newaygo, MINewaygo, MID5.2
Ampco Pumps CompanyGlendale, WID5.0
Energy Recovery - San LeandroSan Leandro, CAD4.8
LDI Industries ManitowocManitowoc, WID4.7
Smith Precision Products CoNewbury Park, CAD4.5
HYDAC Cooling SystemsDenver, NCD4.3
Danfoss Power Solutions HopkinsvilleHopkinsville, KYD4.3
Samoa CorporationWeaverville, NCD4.3
Nigrelli, Inc.Kiel, WID4.2
Dynex/Rivett Inc.Pewaukee, WID4.1
PermcoStreetsboro, OHD4.0
Bucher Hydraulics - NewaygoNewaygo, MID4.0
Attica Hydraulic ExchangeChesterfield, MIC3.6
Seepex Inc.Enon, OHC3.3
HYDAC Hydraulic DivisionGlendale Heights, ILC3.2
Richards IndustriesCincinnati, OHC3.2
Oilgear FremontFremont, NEC3.1
Hydrolec, Inc.Jacksonville, FLC3.1
Oilgear - FremontFremont, NEC3.0
Amatrol, Inc.Jeffersonville, INC2.9
Giant IndustriesToledo, OHC2.9
GeartekCorinth, MSC2.9
Monoflo Breen Road FacilityHouston, TXC2.8
Tark, Inc. - BostonBillerica, MAB2.6
Real-Time Laboratories, L.L.C.Boca Raton, FLB2.6
Goulds Pumps (IPG) LLCSeneca Falls, NYB2.3
Eaton HydraulicsGreenwood, SCB2.3
Bucher Hydraulics, Inc. Elgin, ILElgin, ILB2.3
Finish Thompsom IncErie, PAB2.2
Hydro-Gear, HuntingdonHuntingdon, TNB2.2
Poclain HydraulicsSturtevant, WIB2.2
Hydro-Gear, IndianapolisIndianapolis, INB2.1
Greenwood Hyd ScGreenwood, SCB2.0
Bosch Rexroth FniPFountain Inn, SCB1.9
DC/FniP Fountain InnFountain Inn, SCB1.9
Tuff Torq CorporationMorristown, TNB1.8
New Dimensions Precision Machining, LLCUnion, ILB1.8
HYDAC Technology Corp.Bethlehem, PAB1.8
Engineered Sales Inc.Cleveland, OHB1.8
Danfoss Manufacturing FacilityEden Prairie, MNB1.8
Page 1 of 2 Next →

Nationwide industries with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Fluid power motors manufacturing: nearest NAICS cohorts by rated-subset average TCR and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-industry neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Fluid power motors manufacturing?

Across 74 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Fluid power motors manufacturing averages 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Fluid power motors manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Fluid power motors manufacturing has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Fluid power motors manufacturing?

77 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 74 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.

Data sourced from official public datasets, PlainSafetyScore's OSHA ITA / BLS-based industry database (2016-2024). Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore. See our methodology for details.

Working in Fluid power motors manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.

Fluid power motors manufacturing Safety FAQ

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Fluid power motors manufacturing?

Across 74 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Fluid power motors manufacturing averages 2.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Fluid power motors manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Fluid power motors manufacturing has fewer than 100 rated employers, below the case-volume floor for the national industry ranking.

How many employers report in Fluid power motors manufacturing?

77 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 74 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.