Industry profile · NAICS 488510

Freight forwarding

Workplace injury rates across 513 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

513
Employers
3.1
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
2,845
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Freight forwarding average 3.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

3.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
513
employers reporting
2,845
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Freight forwarding Safety Data Reveals

The Freight forwarding sector (NAICS 488510) encompasses 513 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,845 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.1 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Freight forwarding that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 11
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Ruan Transport Corporation T-611 East Chicago, IN D 5.8
Ruan Transport Corporation T-035 Saukville, WI D 5.8
Duncan Center Duncan, SC D 5.7
WorldWide Integrated Supply Chain Solutions, Inc Urbandale, IA D 5.6
Nissin International Transport - Torrance, CA Torrance, CA D 5.5
Glovis America Ph Philadelphia, PA D 5.5
Ruan Transport Corporation T-437 New Brighton, MN D 5.4
Access USA Shipping LLC dba MyUS.com Sarasota, FL C 5.3
Crane Worldwide Logistics - SAV Port Wentworth, GA C 5.3
Detroit Center Romulus, MI C 5.3
Ruan Transport Corporation T-293 Mechanicsburg, PA C 5.3
Senator International Freight Forward LLC Miami, FL C 5.3
USA - Carson, Arnold Center Rd Carson, CA C 5.3
Seattle Renton, WA C 5.2
CMH Columbus, OH C 5.2
Crane Worldwide - CVG Hebron, KY C 5.0
Prsjn - San Juan San Juan, PR C 4.9
Lamar Warehouse Laredo, TX C 4.8
Logis, Inc. Laredo, TX C 4.8
Ruan Transport Corporation T-305 Turlock, CA C 4.8
Tribe Transportation Inc. Gainesville, GA C 4.7
Ruan Transport Corporation T-300 Roswell, NM C 4.7
Apollo Freight - LAX Los Angeles, CA C 4.7
LVD Distribution Center Coppell, TX C 4.5
LAX Dominguez Hills, CA C 4.4
Ruan Transport Corporation T-504 Tulare, CA C 4.4
Corporate Office Lisle, IL C 4.4
humano LLC San Diego, CA C 4.3
Ruan Transport Corporation T-369 Jeffersonville, IN C 4.3
USA - Carteret, Federal Blvd Carteret, NJ C 4.2
Ruan Transport Corporation T-039 Rialto, CA C 4.2
Ruan Transport Corporation T-128 Madison, WI C 4.2
ORD Branch Franklin Park, IL C 4.1
ProTrans El Paso El Paso, TX C 4.0
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (BFA-6311) Jamaica, NY C 4.0
Ruan Transport Corporation T-644 Gordonsville, VA C 4.0
Ruan Transport Corporation T-272 Braselton, GA C 3.9
Tigers LAX Rancho Dominguez, CA C 3.9
HFS-LAX Montebello, CA C 3.9
SEA Seatac, WA C 3.8
Ruan Transport Corporation T-038 Tampa, FL C 3.8
Glovis America Ma Montgomery, AL C 3.7
Ruan Transport Corporation T-434 Akron, OH C 3.7
Greenwood, IN - E-commerce Greenwood, IN C 3.6
RIM logistics, ltd. - LAX Santa Fe Springs, LA B 3.6
Crane Worldwide Logistics Romulus, MI B 3.6
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (TXC-6359) Pharr, TX B 3.5
Forest Park Fs (Gafrp) Forest Park, GA B 3.5
CLT Charlotte, NC B 3.5
Apex Logistics International Inc. SFO South San Francisco, CA B 3.5
← Prev Page 2 of 11 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Freight forwarding?

This sector averages 3.1 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.