Industry profile · NAICS 562111

Garbage collection services

Workplace injury rates across 1,706 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,706
Employers
6.3
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
37,970
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Garbage collection services average 6.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

6.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
1,706
employers reporting
37,970
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Garbage collection services Safety Data Reveals

The Garbage collection services sector (NAICS 562111) encompasses 1,706 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 37,970 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Garbage collection services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 50
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Whitton Container Cincinnati, OH F 17.1
Casella Waste - Columbia Columbia, ME F 17.1
North Lincoln Sanitary Service Lincoln City, OR F 17.1
East Indianapolis, IN F 17.0
Independent Recycling Services Inc Chicago, IL F 17.0
Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Sanitation Chicago, IL F 17.0
6935-Sw - Solid Waste Charlotte, NC F 17.0
C-6 Disposa Systems Inc. Converse, TX F 16.9
Strategic Sanitation Services, Inc. Mission Viejo, CA F 16.9
Conwaste Recogido Fajardo Guarbo, PR F 16.9
Hartel's Disposal Proctor, MN F 16.8
Waste Pro 106 - Palm Coast Bunnell, FL F 16.8
LFUCG - Division of Waste Management Lexington, KY F 16.8
Howie's Enterprises LLC Manhattan, KS F 16.8
Area - Morton Morton, IL F 16.8
Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Carolina Gurabo, PR F 16.7
City of Asheville Public Works Asheville, NC F 16.7
Trash Butler Tampa, FL F 16.7
Recology South Bay San Jose, CA F 16.6
Recology Sonoma Marin Santa Rosa, CA F 16.6
J. P. Mascaro & Sons Nanticoke, PA F 16.6
Meridian Waste Missouri, LLC Foristell, MO F 16.5
Solid Waste management (SWM) Cedar Rapids, IA F 16.5
Conwaste Santa Isabel Gurabo, PR F 16.5
j. P. Mascaro & Sons - Nassau Division Allentown, PA F 16.4
Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Sanitation District Sanitation Office - D2 Chicago, IL F 16.3
Recology Western Oregon - Coast Warrenton, OR F 16.2
Chester Garage Chester, NY F 16.2
Conwaste Coamo Gurabo, PR F 16.1
Metro- Solid Waste Operations- St John's Landfill Portland, OR F 16.1
Lawson Rubbish Disposal, LLC Emmett, MI F 15.9
Clayton Clatyon, IN F 15.9
Recogido Aguas Buenas Gurabo, PR F 15.8
TDS Starcrest San Antonio, TX F 15.8
County Waste of Pennsylvania LLC 2 Lake Ariel, PA F 15.7
CWS Recogido Municipio Toa Baja Gurabo, PR F 15.6
Blow Brothers Inc Old Orchard Beach, ME F 15.6
Chester Hauling Chester, NY F 15.5
Minneapolis Refuse, Inc. Minneapolis, MN F 15.5
Recology Sonoma Marin - Standish Santa Rosa, CA F 15.3
Advanced Disposal - Charleston Charleston, IL F 15.2
Advanced Disposal - Shippensburg Shippensburg, PA F 15.2
Advanced Disposal - St. Johns County Hauling St. Augustine, FL F 15.2
Allwaste Services, Inc Lexington, SC F 15.2
Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos San Juan Gurabo, PR F 15.1
Eagan Facility Eagan, MN F 15.1
Draw Enterprises III Chicago, IL F 15.1
Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough Scarborough, ME F 15.1
Stericycle - Southampton,PA Southampton, PA F 15.1
Marck Recycling & Waste Services of NEA Jonesboro, AR F 15.0
← Prev Page 3 of 50 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Garbage collection services?

This sector averages 6.3 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.