Industry profile · NAICS 327215

Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass

Workplace injury rates across 446 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

446
Employers
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
8,281
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass average 4.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
446
employers reporting
8,281
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass Safety Data Reveals

The Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass sector (NAICS 327215) encompasses 446 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 8,281 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 5 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
7878_18690 Tracy, CA C 3.7
Lauscha Fiber International Summerville, SC C 3.7
Skyline Design, Inc. Chicago, IL C 3.6
Hoskin & Muir, Inc. - Woon-Tech Whitinsville, MA C 3.6
Heraeus Quartz North America LLC f/k/a Heraeus Tenevo LLC Buford, GA C 3.6
Cardinal IG - Tomah IG Tomah, WI C 3.5
Trulite Grenada Grenada, MS C 3.5
Ficosa North America Cookeville Cookeville, TN C 3.5
Magna Mirrors - Lowell Division Alto, MI C 3.5
SCHOTT Gemtron Vincennes, IN C 3.5
Warrenton Warrenton, MO C 3.5
Agc Automotive Grove City, OH C 3.4
Guardian IG LLC Sun Prairie, WI C 3.4
Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope- Vancouver Battle Ground, WA C 3.4
Phoenix Glass Pittsgrove, NJ C 3.4
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Evansville Evansville, IN C 3.3
Heraeus Quartz NA LLC Buford, GA C 3.3
Ibis Tek Victory Road Saxonburg, PA C 3.3
Bent Glass Design Inc. Hatboro, PA C 3.3
LECO Corporation- Consumables St Joseph, MI C 3.3
Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC - Westland Westland, MI C 3.3
Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope- Tampa Tampa, FL C 3.2
Hoskin and Muir Louisville, KY C 3.2
Commercial Insulating Glass Company, TN Cumberland City, TN C 3.2
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC Elkin, NC C 3.2
Plasman Lawrenceburg, TN C 3.2
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Creighton Creighton, PA C 3.2
Tumwater CG Tumwater, WA C 3.2
Cardinal IG -Hood River IG Hood River, OR C 3.1
Cardinal CG -Moreno Valley CG Moreno Valley, CA C 3.1
Cardinal CT - Mount Airy CT Mount Airy, NC C 3.1
Cardinal CT -Utica CT Utica, OH C 3.1
ODL - Zeeland, MI Zeeland, MI C 3.0
Cardinal CG - Tumwater CG Tumwater, WA C 3.0
Pittsburgh Glass Works Tyrone, PA C 3.0
Cardinal CT - Adel CT Adel, GA C 3.0
Cardinal IG -Wilkes-Barre IG Mountain Top, PA C 3.0
Northeast LG Jessup, PA C 3.0
Trulite Glass W34 Salt Lake City, UT C 3.0
Cardinal IG -Roanoke IG Vinton, VA C 3.0
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Tipton Tyrone, PA C 3.0
Kohler Company Union City, TN C 2.9
DWK Rockwood Rockwood, TN C 2.9
Cardinal CG -Buford CG Buford, GA C 2.9
SBG Newco LLC dba Standard Bent Glass East Butler, PA C 2.8
NASG Holdings Inc. Quakertown, PA C 2.8
Loveland CT Loveland, CO C 2.8
Cardinal CT -Easton CT Easton, PA C 2.8
Cardinal CT - Irving CT Irving, TX C 2.8
Aetna Glass Company Corsicana, TX C 2.8
← Prev Page 5 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass?

This sector averages 4.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.