Industry profile · NAICS 326130

Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 169 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

169
Employers
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,716
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing average 4.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
169
employers reporting
2,716
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing sector (NAICS 326130) encompasses 169 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,716 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Iten Industries Inc. (Plant 1) Ashtabula, OH D 4.8
General Plastics & Composites Ledbetter Houston, TX D 4.8
LSI Wallcovering New Albany, IN D 4.8
Isola Group Ridgeway, SC D 4.8
Bixby Intl Corp Newburyport, MA D 4.7
TPI Composites RI Warren, RI D 4.6
General Formulations Sparta, MI D 4.6
The Gund Company Waukesha, WI D 4.6
Haysite Reinforced Plastics Erie, PA D 4.5
Spaulding Composites Rochester, NH D 4.5
Cedarburg Cedarburg, WI D 4.5
Tangent - Poplar North Aurora, IL D 4.5
PORT Plastics, DBA Lehigh Valley Plastics Bethlehem, PA D 4.5
Clearwater Composites LLC Duluth, MN D 4.4
View Thru Technologies, Inc. Quakertown, PA D 4.2
Wilsonart Fletcher NC Fletcher, NC D 4.1
Kalwall Corporation-Flat Sheet Division Bow, NH D 4.1
Iten Industries Inc. (Plant 2) Ashtabula, OH D 4.0
Innovative Composite Engineering White Salmon, WA C 3.9
Orafol Avon CT Avon, CT C 3.9
Cedarburg/Brown Deer Cedarburg, WI C 3.8
BE Aerospace - Corona Corona, CA C 3.7
Signode-Florence Florence, KY C 3.7
1001 Sullivan Aurora, IL C 3.7
Impact Guard LLC Leetsdale, PA C 3.7
EJ Muskegon Composites Muskegon, MI C 3.6
Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations Washington, PA C 3.6
Iten Industries Inc. (Plant 4) Ashtabula, OH C 3.6
Multifab Inc Spokane Valley, WA C 3.5
Wilton Wilton, NH C 3.5
Wisconsin Location West Allis, WI C 3.5
SwimEx, Inc. Fall River, MA C 3.5
IDEX Health & Science Bristol, CT C 3.4
Formica Corporation Cincinnati, OH C 3.4
Avient Corporation Englewood, CO C 3.3
American Made LLC. Cranberry Twp, PA C 3.2
CPFilms, Inc. Canoga Park, CA C 3.2
Donaldson Company - Ivyland, PA Ivyland, PA C 3.2
PTI Conover, NC C 3.2
SCS Desco Sanford, NC C 3.1
Angleboard Plastics Kankakee, IL C 3.1
Jaeger-Unitek Sealing Solutions, Inc. La Porte, IN C 3.1
FLEXcon Industrial, LLC San Antonio, TX C 3.1
Noblesville Noblesville, IN C 3.0
Clear Impact Acrylics Kansas City, MO C 3.0
ECS Case Grants Pass, OR C 3.0
Gordon Composites Montrose, CO C 3.0
Houston Mykawa Houston, TX C 3.0
Plastech Corporation Addison, TX C 2.9
Olon Industries IL Geneva, IL C 2.9
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Laminated plastics plate, rod, and sheet, manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.