Industry profile · NAICS 339115

Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores)

Workplace injury rates across 163 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

163
Employers
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,522
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores) average 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
163
employers reporting
2,522
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores) Safety Data Reveals

The Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores) sector (NAICS 339115) encompasses 163 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,522 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.4 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Carl Zeiss Vision Inc. San Diego, CA A 1.3
Chesapeake Optical Laboratory Baltimore, MD A 1.1
Winchester Optical Co Elmira, NY A 1.1
WOS Optical Green Bay, WI A 1.1
Walman Optical - Branch 40 Brooklyn Park, MN A 1.1
Walman Optical - Milan Milan, IL A 1.1
Vision Ease - St. Cloud St. Cloud, MN A 1.1
Meridian Optical Phoenix, AZ A 1.0
Cincinnatio, Ohio (Labs) Cincinnati, OH A 1.0
Hawthorne, New York (Labs) Hawthorne, NY A 1.0
Classic Optical Laboratories Youngstown, OH A 1.0
Alcon Johns Creek Manufacturing Johns Creek, GA A 1.0
Alcon JCR Johns Creek, GA A 1.0
Essilor USA dba Bell Optical Columbus, OH A 0.9
CooperVision Scottsville Manufacturing Operations Scottsville, NY A 0.9
Walman Optical - Kent Kent, WA A 0.9
Staar Surgical Lake Forest Lake Forest, CA A 0.9
Erlanger, Kentucky Lab Erlanger, KY A 0.9
VSPOne New York Melville, NY A 0.8
CooperVision Caribbean Corp Juana Diaz, PR A 0.8
CooperVision Manufacturing Puerto Rico LLC Juana Diaz, PR A 0.8
2967-NY119 Depew, NY A 0.8
Luxottica Lockbourne RxO Lockbourne, OH A 0.6
PowerVision, Inc. Belmont, CA A 0.6
TrueVision Systems Goleta, CA A 0.5
Johnson and Johnson Vision Care Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL A 0.5
AMO Puerto Rico Manufacturing, Inc Anasco, PR A 0.5
Optical Supply Inc Grand Rapids, MI A 0.4
Ny119 Reichert Technologies, Inc Depew, NY A 0.4
Transitions Optical Inc Pinellas Park, FL A 0.4
Johnson and Johnson Vision INC Jacksonville, FL A 0.3
Glaukos- Aliso Viejo Aliso Viejo, CA A 0.3
AMO Puerto Rico Manurfacturing, Inc. Anasco, PR A 0.2
Glaukos- San Clemente San Clemente, CA A 0.1
Alcon Johns Creek Research and Development Johns Creek, GA A 0.1
MGM Optical Laboratory Inc. Caguas, PR C 0.0
Alden Lancaster, NY C 0.0
Hoya Vision Care Chicago Franklin Park, IL C 0.0
Mcleod Optical Warwick, RI C 0.0
LBC Optics, Inc. New Berlin, WI C 0.0
ABB Auburn Hills Auburn Hills, MI C 0.0
Staar Surgical Royal Oaks Monrovia, CA C 0.0
OptiCraft Portland, OR C 0.0
Opticote, Inc Franklin Park, IL C 0.0
Walman Optical - York York, PA C 0.0
Laramy-K Optical Indianola, IA C 0.0
Beitler McKee Optical Pittsburgh, PA C 0.0
LensGen Inc. Irvine, CA C 0.0
Glaukos- Burlington Burlington, MA C 0.0
X-Cel Specialty Contacts Duluth, GA C 0.0
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Lens grinding, ophthalmic (except in retail stores)?

This sector averages 2.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.