Industry profile · NAICS 326111

Manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 335 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

335
Employers
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
6,099
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Manufacturing average 3.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.1 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
335
employers reporting
6,099
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Manufacturing sector (NAICS 326111) encompasses 335 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,099 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 6 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
CDF Corporation 77 Industrial Park Rd. Plymouth, Ma 02360, MA A 1.3
Advanced Poly Packaging, Inc. Akron, OH A 1.3
Rochester (formerly Pachtech LLC) Rochester, NY A 1.3
Berry Plastics Odon Odon, IN A 1.3
Superbag Operating Ltd. Houston, TX A 1.2
Coldkeepers W2 Thomasville, GA A 1.2
Flair Flexible Packaging Corporation Appleton, WI A 1.2
Inteplast Engineered Films - Westborough Westborough, MA A 1.2
Presto Consumer Products Carrolton, TX A 1.2
Heritage Bag-Fairfield Fairfield, OH A 1.2
Thermo Fisher Scientific - Millersburg, PA Millersburg, PA A 1.2
SC Johnson & Son, Inc. Wilder Rd Bay City, MI A 1.1
Coveris Tomah Tomah, WI A 1.1
Villa Rica Metalizing (3) Villa Rica, GA A 1.1
Gunze Plastics & Engineering Corporation of America Olathe, KS A 1.1
Presto Appleton Appleton, WI A 1.1
Liqui-Box Upper Sandusky Upper Sandusky, OH A 1.1
Global Packaging Inc. - Hamlet Hamlet, NC A 1.1
Mondi Bags Salt Lake City, UT A 1.0
Presto Products Lewiston, UT A 1.0
DS Smith (Rapak) - Romeoville Romeoville, IL A 1.0
Paradise Plastics LLC Brooklyn, NY A 1.0
Derby Fabricating Solutions - Rockford Rockford, MI A 0.9
Berry Global Sioux Falls Sioux Falls, SD A 0.9
Berry Global Lewisburg, TN A 0.9
Glad Manufacturing Rogers, AR A 0.9
Amcor Flexibles Mundelein Mundelein, IL A 0.9
Berry Global Waxahachie Waxahachie, TX A 0.9
Rochester Rochester, NY A 0.9
Reynolds Consumer Products LLC. Temple, Tx 76501, TX A 0.9
Hefty Business Unit - Tamaqua, Pennsylvania Tamaqua, PA A 0.9
First Quality Print and Packaging, LLC Anderson, SC A 0.9
International Paper - SpaceKraft (Voyager) Indianapolis, IN A 0.9
Mt. Prospect Mt. Prospect, IL A 0.8
Cryovac Iowa Park, TX A 0.8
Amcor Specialty Films Oshkosh, WI A 0.8
Glad Mfg Amherst, VA A 0.8
Pitt Plastics Pittsburg Pittsburg, KS A 0.8
Reynolds Presto Products South Boston, VA A 0.8
Sharp Packaging Tempe Tempe, AZ A 0.8
Dazpak Columbus Columbus, OH A 0.8
Temple PE Temple, TX A 0.7
Purdue Plant Altanta, GA A 0.7
Hercules Inc Eclectic, AL A 0.7
Berry Plastics Industrial Aurora, IL A 0.6
Unit Pack Co., Inc. Cedar Grove, NJ A 0.6
Protective Lining INC Brooklyn, NY A 0.6
Thermo Fisher Scientific Logan, UT A 0.6
FSM TX LLC d/b/a Five Star Management Houston, TX A 0.6
Berry Global- Victoria TX Victoria, TX A 0.6
← Prev Page 6 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.7 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.