Industry profile · NAICS 488320

Marine cargo handling services

Workplace injury rates across 438 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

438
Employers
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
10,939
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Marine cargo handling services average 5.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

5.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
438
employers reporting
10,939
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Marine cargo handling services Safety Data Reveals

The Marine cargo handling services sector (NAICS 488320) encompasses 438 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 10,939 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Marine cargo handling services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Portsmouth Marine Terminal Portsmouth, VA D 7.6
Balterm LLC Baltimore, MD D 7.6
Tri-State Maritime Services Mobile, AL D 7.5
East Hawaii Port of Hilo Hilo, HI D 7.5
Brunswick Marine Port Terminal Brunswick, GA D 7.5
SSA Pacific- Longview Longview, WA D 7.5
SSA Gulf - Beaumont Beaumont, TX D 7.5
Total Terminals International - SEA Seattle, WA D 7.5
Watermark NOLA New Orleans, LA D 7.4
Marine Terminals Corporation - Fairfield Baltimore, MD D 7.3
Dundalk Marine Terminal Baltimore, MD D 7.3
SSA Pacific - Longview Longview, WA D 7.3
Wilmington, NC - SEC Wilmington, NC D 7.2
Galveston Pier 10 Galveston, TX D 7.1
Coos Bay Shipping North Bend, OR D 7.0
Ports America Chesapeake - Dundalk Marine Terminal Baltimore, MD D 7.0
Napoleon Avenue New Orleans, LA D 6.9
Federal Marine Terminals of Albany Albany, NY D 6.9
Nashville Avenue New Orleans, LA D 6.9
Port Newark Auto Terminal Newark, NJ D 6.8
Concord Naval Weapons Stations San Pedro, CA D 6.8
GulfPort San Pedro, CA D 6.8
Sea Star Stevedore Co. (WA) Tacoma, WA D 6.7
Jacintoport International, LLC Houston, TX D 6.7
CPA - Beaumont Operations Beaumont, TX D 6.6
Pbc Services Inc Houma, LA D 6.6
267 Jacksonville Int'L Gateway Jacksonville, FL D 6.6
Ports America Chesapeake - Fairfield Marine Terminal Baltimore, MD D 6.5
Premier Bulk Stevedoring Panama City Panama City, FL D 6.5
SSA Pacific, Stockton Terminal Stockton, CA D 6.5
Metro Cruise SF San Francisco, CA D 6.5
SSAT Tacoma CEM Tacoma, WA D 6.5
PALA (NOLA Sites & M/R) San Pedro, CA D 6.4
Luis A. Ayala Colon Sucrs., Inc. San Juan, PR D 6.4
Freeport San Pedro, CA D 6.4
Ports America Chesapeake - Seagirt Marine Terminal Baltimore, MD D 6.4
Richmond CA Richmond, CA D 6.3
New Bedford New Bedford, MA D 6.2
SSA Terminals Terminal 5 Seattle, WA D 6.2
Multimodal Engineers Company - Husky Terminal Tacoma, WA D 6.2
Tote- North Anchorage, AK D 6.2
Stockton - MP Stockton, CA D 6.1
Charleston Stevedoring Company, LLC Charleston, SC D 6.1
Federal Marine Terminals Inc. Cleveland, OH D 6.1
Port Newark Auto Terminal (PNAT) Newark, NJ D 6.1
Bayport Seabrook, TX D 6.1
Associated Grain Terminals, LLC Convent, LA D 6.0
Norfolk International Terminals Norfolk, VA D 5.9
San Diego Ship Provision - Naval National City, CA D 5.9
Marquis Marine, Inc. Hennepin, IL D 5.8
← Prev Page 3 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Marine cargo handling services?

This sector averages 5.7 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.