Industry profile · NAICS 488320

Marine cargo handling services

Workplace injury rates across 438 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

438
Employers
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
10,939
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Marine cargo handling services average 5.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

5.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
438
employers reporting
10,939
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Marine cargo handling services Safety Data Reveals

The Marine cargo handling services sector (NAICS 488320) encompasses 438 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 10,939 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Marine cargo handling services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 7 of 9
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Ports America Davisville North Kingston, RI B 2.3
Maher Berth 64 Elizabeth, NJ B 2.3
SSA Terminals, LLC PCT LB 245-270 Long Beach, CA B 2.3
Associated Terminals at Globalplex, LLC Convent, LA B 2.3
Associated Marine Equipment, LLC Convent, LA A 2.3
First Coast Terminals Jacksonville, FL A 2.2
Negociado Maritimo - Muelle 8 - 9 - 10 - 12 - 13 San Juan, PR A 2.2
CN Duluth Ore Dock Duluth, MN A 2.2
Watermark Terminal Tacoma Tacoma, WA A 2.1
Long Beach - MCS Long Beach, CA A 2.1
Gulfstar (Marine Division) Kingwood, TX A 2.1
Logistec USA / Cleveland Breakbulk Cleveland, OH A 2.0
DIX Shipping Inc. Brownsville, TX A 2.0
Portus Services LLC Jacksonville, FL A 2.0
Midwest Terminals of Toledo International Inc.-Facility 1 Toledo, OH A 2.0
Port Newark Container Terminal Newark, NJ A 1.9
LaPlace Stevedoring Laplace, LA A 1.9
Hickman Blytheville, AR A 1.9
Charleston Gate Company, LLC Charleston, SC A 1.9
Seaonus Stevedoring - New Orleans LLC New Orleans, FL A 1.9
Sprague Operating Resources - Searsport Searsport, ME A 1.9
Black Falcon Terminal Boston, MA A 1.9
Suderman Contracting Stevedores (Galveston) dba Metro Ports Galveston, TX A 1.8
DFW-Ocean Dallas, TX A 1.8
Port Manatee Palmetto, FL A 1.8
Logistec Everglades LLC Fort Lauderdale, FL A 1.8
WTPS - Houston Material Handling Houston, TX A 1.8
Premier Bulk Stevedoring Mobile, AL A 1.8
Houston Material Handling Houston, TX A 1.8
Consol Marine Terminal LLC Baltimore, MD A 1.7
Maui Port of Kahului Kahului, HI A 1.7
WTPS - Ghent Ghent, KY A 1.6
SSA Pacific Benicia Benicia, CA A 1.6
BMW Shuttle Jersey City, NJ A 1.6
Port of Freeport Freeport, TX A 1.6
Pier IX Newport News, VA A 1.6
Texas Internationnal Terminals Galveston, TX A 1.6
Intership Services Inc. Houston, TX A 1.6
SSA Gulf - Gulfport Gulfport, MS A 1.6
Core Industries, Inc. Theodore, AL A 1.6
AmSpec LLC - Bostco, TX Laporte, TX A 1.6
Seaboard Energy, LLC St. Joseph, MO A 1.4
WTPS Port Birmingham Mulga, AL A 1.4
Logistec USA - Brunswick Brunswick, GA A 1.4
Trinity Trinity, AL A 1.4
Deepwater Pasadena, TX A 1.4
Coast Maritime Services, INC. (CMS) San Pedro, CA A 1.4
J.H. Stevedoring Company, Inc. Philadelphia, PA A 1.3
SeaGate Terminals Virginia Chesapeake, VA A 1.3
Brooklyn Cruise Terminal Brooklyn, NY A 1.3
← Prev Page 7 of 9 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Marine cargo handling services?

This sector averages 5.7 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.