Industry profile · NAICS 333241

Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 225 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

225
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,834
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
225
employers reporting
2,834
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing sector (NAICS 333241) encompasses 225 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,834 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 5
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Vollrath Company LLC, Kiel Kiel, WI D 5.7
Modesto Dairy Solutions Turlock, CA D 5.6
Urschel Laboratories Chesterton, IN D 5.5
American Extrusion International South Beloit, IL D 5.4
Urschel Chesterton, IN D 5.3
Research/Technical Services Rancho Cucamonga, CA D 5.3
Reyco Systems Caldwell Caldwell, ID D 5.2
Cokato Cokato, MN D 5.1
Paragon International Nevada, IA D 5.0
Hansaloy Corporation Davenport, IA D 5.0
Koss Industrial, Inc. Green Bay, WI D 5.0
Design Corrugating Co/Design Manufacturing and Equipment Co Taylorville, IL D 4.8
2023 Eirich Machines Establishment Gurnee, IL D 4.7
Bettendorf Stanford Salem, IL D 4.6
Tetra Pak Processing Equipment Inc - Winsted Winsted, MN D 4.5
Tetra Pak Windsor Windsor, WI D 4.5
American International Mfg Woodland, CA D 4.5
Barlean's Oils Ferndale, WA D 4.5
Cozzini LLC Elk Grove Village, IL D 4.4
River Point Farms Processing Plymouth, WA D 4.3
Rome LTD dba Rome Grinding Solutions Sheldon, IA D 4.3
H2O innovation USA, inc. Vermont Swanton, VT D 4.2
Advance Process Tech inc Cokato, MN D 4.1
Speco Inc Schiller Park, IL D 4.1
Belshaw Bros Inc Auburn, WA D 4.1
SirSteak Machinery, Inc Mansfield, OH D 4.0
Thomas Precision Inc Rice Lake, WI D 4.0
Marchant Schmidt Fond Du Lac, WI D 4.0
Baxter Manufacturing Orting, WA D 4.0
Relco LLC Willmar, MN D 4.0
Apeks LLC Johnstown, OH D 4.0
MP Equipment LLC Gainesville, GA D 4.0
Lawrence Equipment, Inc. South El Monte, CA C 3.9
Marblehead Plant Marblehead, OH C 3.8
Gold Medal Products - Cincinnati Evendale, OH C 3.7
Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. Gainesville, GA C 3.7
GEA Hudson, WI C 3.7
Stainless Systems, Inc. South Hutchinson, KS C 3.7
Tomahawk Mfg. Plymouth Plymouth, WI C 3.6
Fluid Quip Inc Springfield, OH C 3.5
Tetra Pak Processing Equipment Inc Winsted, MN C 3.5
Laitram Machinery Harahan, LA C 3.5
Wolfe Electric, Inc Wichita, KS C 3.4
Vollrath Company LLC, Kewaunee West Kewaunee, WI C 3.3
BAADER LINCO, Inc. Kansas City, KS C 3.3
Baxter Orting, WA Orting, WA C 3.3
Stainless Technologies Menomonie, WI C 3.3
ITW-Hobart Corporation Hillsboro, OH C 3.3
Q Plant West Columbia, SC C 3.2
Norland International Inc./American Beer Equipmen Lincoln, NE C 3.2
← Prev Page 2 of 5 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Meat grinders, food-type, manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.