Industry profile · NAICS 237120

Natural gas pipeline construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,128 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,128
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
6,429
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Natural gas pipeline construction average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,128
employers reporting
6,429
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Natural gas pipeline construction Safety Data Reveals

The Natural gas pipeline construction sector (NAICS 237120) encompasses 1,128 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,429 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Natural gas pipeline construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 23 of 23
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Norman, OK Norman, OK C 0.0
Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Wakeman, OH Wakeman, OH C 0.0
103493 - Cushing Tank Terminal Mechanical Cushing, OK C 0.0
103615 - Billy Miner Terminal 2 Pecos, TX C 0.0
E&C Baytown Restoration Baytown, TX C 0.0
E&C Westlake Westlake, LA C 0.0
Michels Pipeline- CA Rio Vista, CA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - ExxonMobil Chem Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Lignotech Femandina Beach, FL C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Meadwestvaco Deridder, LA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - OXEA Bay City, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at NALCO Garyville Garyville, LA C 0.0
JFSNA at Dow Hahnville Hahnville, LA C 0.0
JFSNA at ExxonMobil Beaumont Beaumont, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at ExxonMobil Lubricants Port Allen Port Allen, LA C 0.0
JFSNA at Huntsman McIntosh Mcintosh, AL C 0.0
JFSNA at Kimberly Clark Paris, TX C 0.0
Gallop Tower Field Services Houston, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at Merichem Houston Houston, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at Monsanto Luling Luling, LA C 0.0
JFSNA at Pinal Creek Globe, AZ C 0.0
JFSNA at Suncor Commerce City Commerce City, CO C 0.0
JIS at Chemours Washington, WV C 0.0
Location 1 Saint Louis, MO C 0.0
CES Partners, LLC dba Clear Energy Services, LLC Cypress, TX C 0.0
HEATEX Industries, Inc. Lumberton, TX C 0.0
McDermott, Inc. - Marine Operations (NO102) Houston, TX C 0.0
Service Engineering Repair Co., Inc. Borger, TX C 0.0
Marathon Detroit Refinery Detroit, MI C 0.0
103112 - Colorado OGC Small Caps 2016 Greeley, CO C 0.0
OIS-Rancho Dominguez Rancho Dominguez, CA C 0.0
JFSNA at Celanese Bishop Bishop, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at Celanese Clear Lake Pasadena, TX C 0.0
JFSNA at AKZO Nobel Houston Houston, TX C 0.0
E&C Baytown Baytown, TX C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Chevron Pascagoula, MS C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - Olgethorpe Power Dalton, GA C 0.0
Performance Contractors, Inc. - BASF Freeport Freeport, TX C 0.0
Houston Pipeline Project- CBI Services, LLC Hickory, PA C 0.0
Elkhorn Construction, Four Corners Service Area Bloomfield, NM C 0.0
Elkhorn Construction, Western Slope Service Area Debeque, CO C 0.0
D & G Directional Drilling Inc. Winnsboro, TX C 0.0
← Prev Page 23 of 23
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Natural gas pipeline construction?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.