Industry profile · NAICS 562219

Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities)

Workplace injury rates across 191 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

191
Employers
6.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
2,815
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) average 6.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

6.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
191
employers reporting
2,815
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) Safety Data Reveals

The Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) sector (NAICS 562219) encompasses 191 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,815 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 6.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 6.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Zero Waste San Jose, CA F 7.4
Entech, Inc. Middlebury, in, IN F 7.3
BDS Waste Disposal, Inc. Fairfield, ME F 7.2
Stericycle - Carolina,PR Carolina, PR F 7.1
SOUTHWASTE EMPLOYMENT, LLC- Silver City Las Vegas, NV F 7.1
Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. Bronx Bronx, NY F 7.0
Stericycle - Clinton,IL Clinton, IL F 7.0
Stericycle - Hollister,CA Hollister, CA F 6.9
Byron Center Facility Byron Center, MI F 6.9
Stericycle - Reserve,LA Reserve, LA F 6.8
Stericycle - Dale,TX Dale, TX F 6.8
Stericycle - Conroe,TX Conroe, TX F 6.7
LASAN - Solid Resources Processing and Construction Division - CLARTS Los Angeles, CA F 6.5
Stericycle - Sturtevant,WI Sturtevant, WI F 6.5
Stericycle - Springhill,LA Springhill, LA F 6.4
Beck Landfill Schertz, TX F 6.3
LRS - Morton Grove Morton Grove, IL F 6.1
Stericycle - Gary,IN Gary, IN F 6.1
Repowered St Paul, MN F 6.1
ESMI of New York, LLC Fort Edward, NY F 6.1
VLS Piedmont Mauldin, SC F 6.0
Stericycle - Fresno,CA Fresno, CA F 5.8
County Waste LLC 8 Mechanicsville, VA F 5.7
Stericycle - Jacksonville,FL-5169 West 12th Jacksonville, FL F 5.6
Lambland Inc dba A-1 Organics Eaton, CO F 5.6
LRS - Woodstock Woodstock, IL F 5.6
Environmental Specialists, Inc. Youngstown, OH F 5.4
Stericycle - Farmingdale,NY Farmingdale, NY F 5.3
SOUTHWASTE EMPLOYMENT, LLC- Mansfield Mansfield, TX D 5.0
Stericycle - Harlingen,TX Harlingen, TX D 5.0
Stericycle - St. Louis,MO St. Louis, MO D 5.0
Clean Earth of Connecticut Plainville, CT D 5.0
Stericycle - Baltimore,MD-5901 Chemical Baltimore, MD D 5.0
Stericycle - Vernon,CA Vernon, CA D 5.0
ERC of PA Lancaster, PA D 4.9
Plant Gorgas - APC Parrish, AL D 4.9
Stericycle - Woonsocket,RI-369 Park East Woonsocket, RI D 4.7
Stericycle - Stroud,OK Stroud, OK D 4.6
Trilogy MedWaste Houston, TX D 4.5
Clean Earth of Carteret Carteret, NJ D 4.5
Zanker San Jose, CA D 4.5
Stericycle - West Columbia,SC West Columbia, SC D 4.4
Stericycle - Haw River,NC Haw River, NC D 4.4
LRS - Monmouth Hauling Monmouth, IL D 4.0
Sprint Environmental Services, LLC Crosby, TX D 4.0
LRS - Atomic Minneapolis, MN D 3.9
LRS - Atkins AR Atkins, AR D 3.7
JG Environmental 202 Lancaster, PA D 3.7
Ina Land Reclamation Facility Tucson, AZ D 3.7
Shamrock Environmental Corporation (Richmond) Richmond, VA D 3.6
← Prev Page 2 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities)?

This sector averages 6.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.