Industry profile · NAICS 334511

Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 416 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

416
Employers
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
3,191
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing average 1.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
416
employers reporting
3,191
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing sector (NAICS 334511) encompasses 416 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,191 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
EdgeOne LLC West Wareham, MA A 0.9
BAE Systems I&S - Fort Walton Beach Fort Walton Beach, FL A 0.9
L3 Harris Maritime Systems Ayer, MA A 0.9
Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Moorestown Centrtn 300 (5201) Moorestown, NJ A 0.9
NV - Sparks Operations Sparks, NV A 0.9
NGMS-B750 Annapolis, MD A 0.9
Superalloy Manufacturing Solutions Corporation Plant 2/3 Cincinnati, OH A 0.9
Broomfield BCH Broomfield, CO A 0.9
Malabar FL 2800 Jordan Blvd Malabar, FL A 0.9
Gentex Corporation-Manchester Manchester, NH A 0.9
Aero Foil International Muskegon, MI A 0.9
Kearfott GND Woodland Park, NJ A 0.9
Elbit Systems of America, Merrimack Operations Merrimack, NH A 0.9
Space and Airborne Systems : CA, Van Nuys - 7821 Orion Ave. (SAS-EW) Van Nuys, CA A 0.9
Astronautics Corporation of America Oak Creek, WI A 0.9
Airtronics Inc Tucson, AZ A 0.9
BAE Systems Electronic Systems GNY Greenlawn, NY A 0.9
Moog Inc. Goleta Goleta, CA A 0.9
NGMS-B340 Clinton, TN A 0.9
Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. Nashua, NH A 0.8
Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) Liverpool, NY A 0.8
Kollsman, Inc. Merrimack, NH A 0.8
Meggitt Engine Systems San Diego, CA A 0.8
Appareo Systems Fargo, ND A 0.8
HoneywellFL49 Sarasota, FL A 0.8
IRF Intelligent RF Solutions LLC Sparks, MD A 0.8
NGMS-N632 Boulder, CO A 0.8
Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) Liverpool, NY A 0.8
Bowmar LLC Fort Wayne, IN A 0.8
Space and Airborne Systems : CO, CO Springs - 8955 AandB Drennan Rd. (SAS-SSG) Colorado Springs, CO A 0.8
Integrated Mission Systems : UT, Salt Lake City - 2645 South 300 West (IMS-M) Salt Lake City, UT A 0.8
Ideal Aerosmith Grand Forks, ND A 0.8
NGMS-W526 Charlottesville, VA A 0.8
Rockwell Collins (Decorah) Decorah, IA A 0.8
Safran Electrical and Power Denton, TX A 0.8
L3 Technologies Inc. Fall River, MA A 0.8
N Amityville NY 1500 New Horizons Blvd North Amityville, NY A 0.8
Space and Airborne Systems : NY, Rochester - 800 Lee Rd. (SAS-SS) Rochester, NY A 0.8
NGMS-S550 Salt Lake City, UT A 0.8
Rockwell Collins - Wilsonville Wilsonville, OR A 0.8
ELTA North America Annapolis Junction, MD A 0.7
Ultra - Campanelli Drive Braintree, MA A 0.7
Raytheon Company Louisville, KY A 0.7
Raytheon_Forest_MS Forest, MS A 0.7
Marlborough MA Marlborough, MA A 0.7
Rockwell Collins - Richardson Richardson, TX A 0.7
CAES Systems LLC - Lansdale Lansdale, PA A 0.7
NGMS-Q953 Elkridge, MD A 0.7
NGMS-T340 Baltimore, MD A 0.7
Raytheon_Louisville_KY Louisville, KY A 0.7
← Prev Page 4 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Position indicators (e.g., for landing gear, stabilizers), airframe equipment, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.