Industry profile · NAICS 562920

Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream

Workplace injury rates across 374 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

374
Employers
5.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
4,481
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream average 5.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

5.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
374
employers reporting
4,481
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream Safety Data Reveals

The Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream sector (NAICS 562920) encompasses 374 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,481 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 10
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
S06712 - Hodgkins MRF Hodgkins, IL D 5.1
RSSN Recycling Center North Las Vegas, NV D 5.0
Recycling Industries Inc North Highlands, CA D 5.0
Portland East Recycle Portland, OR D 5.0
S07500 - Philadelphia MRF Philadelphia, PA D 4.9
Fremont Recycling and Transfer Station Fremont, CA D 4.8
Recyclery at Newby Island Milpitas, CA D 4.8
Airmont TS Airmount, NY D 4.8
Qrp - Nhv New Haven, IN D 4.8
Manassas 3807 Manassas, VA D 4.8
Fort Worth Ft Worth, TX D 4.8
Carolina Recycling Corp. Gurabo, PR D 4.8
Elk River Resource Processing Plant Elk River, MN D 4.7
King County Wastewater Treatment Seattle, WA D 4.7
New Haven - QRP New Haven, IN D 4.6
5555 Manchester Ave STL Saint Louis, MO D 4.6
Quincy QRP Quincy, IL D 4.5
Ocean Enterprises LLC Minneapolis, MN D 4.5
MGI Trenton, NJ D 4.4
S09564 - WM Recycling Palm Beach West Palm Beach, FL D 4.4
Goleta Goleta, CA D 4.4
Technimark LLC - WELLMARK Asheboro, NC D 4.4
Balcones Recycling- Dallas Farmers Branch, TX D 4.4
Columbus, Oh Material Recovery Facility Columbus, OH D 4.4
Casella Recycling Auburn Auburn, MA D 4.3
van der Linde Recycling Troy, VA D 4.3
MBL Recycling Palatine, IL D 4.3
TAM Recycling, LLC Pownal, VT D 4.3
S06563 - Davis St MRF San Leandro, CA D 4.3
L&S Demo Recycling, Inc. Conshohocken, PA D 4.3
Wistron GreenTech (Texas) Corporation Mckinney, TX D 4.3
ReSource Waste Services - Roxbury Roxbury, MA D 4.3
C2 Management Berryville, VA D 4.3
West Bend - QRP West Bend, WI D 4.3
Willimantic Waste Paper CO., INC Windham, CT D 4.2
Casella recycling Resources, Apalachin Apalachin, NY D 4.2
Viatek Solutions, Clearwater Clearwater, FL D 4.2
Johns Recycling, Inc. Franksville, WI D 4.2
Cleanlites Recycling Cincinnati, OH D 4.1
Viatek Solutions ATL Lawrenceville, GA D 4.1
Moncalm MRF Indianapolis, IN D 4.1
Chester Chester, VA D 4.0
C & I Electronics Co., Inc. Evansville, IN D 4.0
ReEnergy Lewiston Lewiston, ME D 4.0
Parallel Products of Kentucky Louisville, KY D 4.0
Materials Recovery Facility Appleton, WI D 4.0
S09102 - Pittsburgh MRF Pittsburgh, PA D 4.0
Manufacturing Loxley, AL D 4.0
S03306 - Tualatin Valley Waste Recovery Hillsboro, OR D 4.0
AMP Robotics - P2 Lithonia Lithonia, GA D 4.0
← Prev Page 4 of 10 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Removal of recyclable materials from a waste stream?

This sector averages 5.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.