Industry profile · NAICS 562212

Sanitary landfills

Workplace injury rates across 221 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

221
Employers
5.0
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
3,476
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Sanitary landfills average 5.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

5.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
221
employers reporting
3,476
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Sanitary landfills Safety Data Reveals

The Sanitary landfills sector (NAICS 562212) encompasses 221 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 3,476 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Sanitary landfills that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 7
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
City of Goldsboro/ Solid Waste Division Goldsboro, NC F 8.5
Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corp Johnston, RI F 8.5
Public Works Asheboro, NC F 8.5
Caja del Rio Landfill Santa Fe, NM F 8.2
Chancellor Landfill Fredericksburg, VA F 7.9
Wetzel County Sanitary Landfill New Martinsville, WV F 7.8
Scholl Canyon Landfill Los Angeles, CA F 7.7
Puente Hills Landfill City of Industry, CA F 7.7
S04530 - Middle Peninsula Landfill Glenns, VA F 7.5
Otay LF Chula Vista, CA F 7.4
Landfill Technologies Vrs. Toa Baja Gurabo, PR F 7.4
S03315 - Northwest Regional Landfill Surprise, AZ F 7.3
Sunshine Canyon Landfill Sylmar, CA F 7.2
Kimble Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Crooked Run New Philadelphia, OH F 7.2
Transit Hauling Bloomfield, NM F 7.2
Republic Services Brownsville Brownsville, TX F 7.2
Three Rivers Solid Waste Autho Jackson, SC F 7.0
Medora Landfill and Refuse Hauling Medora, IN F 7.0
Crawford County Landfill Bucyrus, OH F 6.9
S04117 - Chestnut Ridge Landfill Heiskell, TN F 6.8
Kimble Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Twinsburg Twinsburg, OH F 6.8
Kimble Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Cambridge Cambridge, OH F 6.7
Iowa Waste Services, LLC Malvern, IA F 6.7
Site #2 Marion, IA F 6.5
Solid Waste Bend, OR F 6.5
Seneca Landfill, Inc. Mars, PA F 6.3
Pike County Facility Waverly, OH F 6.2
Monterey Regional Waste Management District Marina, CA F 6.1
S04247 - Columbia Ridge Landfill Recycling Center Arlington, OR F 6.1
S03957 - Butterfield Station Landfill Maricopa, AZ F 6.1
Refuse Division - Kapaa Transfer Station Kailua, HI F 6.0
Republic Services of Michigan 1LLC Carleton Farms Landfill New Boston, MI F 6.0
Wailuku Refuse Base Yard Wailuku, HI F 6.0
Commonwealth Environmental Systems, LP Hegins, PA F 5.9
Beech Hollow Wellston, OH F 5.9
Pine Ridge Landfill Griffin, GA F 5.8
S04003 - Pheasant Point Landfill Bennington, NE F 5.8
Bartholomew County Solid Waste Management District Columbus, IN F 5.8
orchard hill sanitary landfill Watervliet, MI F 5.7
S06553 - Prairie View Landfill Wilmington, IL F 5.7
S03948 - WI Metro LF Franklin, WI F 5.6
Kimble Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Canton Canton, OH F 5.3
S03305 - Hillsboro Landfill Hillsboro, OR F 5.3
AWS of Frankfort Frankfort, KY F 5.3
Drd Lf Arcadia, FL D 5.2
Recology Hay Road Vacaville, CA D 5.2
East Penn Sanitation Inc. Bethlehem, PA D 5.1
South Shelby LF Memphis, TN D 5.1
Apex Environmental, LLC Amsterdam, OH D 5.0
S04533 - Superior Landfill Savannah, GA D 5.0
← Prev Page 2 of 7 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Sanitary landfills?

This sector averages 5.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.