Industry profile · NAICS 561320

Temporary staffing services

Workplace injury rates across 1,185 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,185
Employers
4.1
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
12,489
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Temporary staffing services average 4.1 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

4.1
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
1,185
employers reporting
12,489
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Temporary staffing services Safety Data Reveals

The Temporary staffing services sector (NAICS 561320) encompasses 1,185 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 12,489 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.1 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.1 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Temporary staffing services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 23 of 24
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Elite Personnel Consultants, Inc. Austin, TX C 0.0
Excellent Personnel Consultants, Inc. Austin, TX C 0.0
Evins Personnel Consultants, Inc. Austin, TX C 0.0
HQ - Bloomington Bloomington, MN C 0.0
Goodwill staffing csra Augusta, GA C 0.0
Preferred Staffing - Roseville Roseville, MN C 0.0
SPS Tonawanda Tonawanda, NY C 0.0
Corp and Irvine Irvine, CA C 0.0
CTS International Bellevue, WA C 0.0
State Farm Birmingham AL Birmingham, AL C 0.0
Sizemore, Inc. - Norbord @ Kinards (Greenwood) SC - #400-10/20/30 combined Kinards, SC C 0.0
Catalyst-QLM Sanford, FL C 0.0
QLM Sanford, FL C 0.0
State Farm Duluth GA Duluth, GA C 0.0
State Farm Bloomington IL Bloomington, IL C 0.0
HardHat Workforce Solutions Greensboro, NC C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. Woodbury Woodbury, NJ C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. Vineland Vineland, NJ C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. PA HC Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. NJ HC Cherry Hill, NJ C 0.0
Protocall NJ, Inc. (Industrial) Burlington, NJ C 0.0
Tradesmen International Baltimore South Baltimore, MD C 0.0
Tradesmen International Bay Area East Pleasanton, CA C 0.0
Tradesmen International Champaign Champaign, IL C 0.0
Tradesmen International Cocoa Beach Cocoa, FL C 0.0
Tradesmen International Dallas South Arlington, TX C 0.0
Tradesmen International Ft Worth Benbrook, TX C 0.0
Tradesmen International Irvine Irvine, CA C 0.0
Tradesmen International Lincoln Lincoln, NE C 0.0
Tradesmen International Mobile Loxley, AL C 0.0
Tradesmen International Provo Orem, UT C 0.0
Tradesmen International Rochester Mn Rochester, MN C 0.0
Tradesmen International Youngstown OH Austintown, OH C 0.0
Tradesmen International Allentown Bethlehem, PA C 0.0
Tradesmen International Ann Arbor Ann Arbor, MI C 0.0
Tradesmen International Little Rock Little Rock, AR C 0.0
Tradesmen International Rockford Rockford, IL C 0.0
TruTemps El Paso, TX C 0.0
Magnum Houston, TX C 0.0
Bradley Personnel High Point, NC C 0.0
Independence Office (3510) Independence, OH C 0.0
Austin Office (4351) Austin, TX C 0.0
East Hartford Office (0710) East Hartford, CT C 0.0
King of Prussia Office (3822) King of Prussia, PA C 0.0
San Antonio Office (4368) San Antonio, TX C 0.0
ASI St. Petersburg FL St. Petersburg, FL C 0.0
State Farm Bakersfield CA Bakersfield, CA C 0.0
Avera Education and Staffing Solutions Yankton, SD C 0.0
EverStaff - Detroit Lathrup Village, MI C 0.0
← Prev Page 23 of 24 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Temporary staffing services?

This sector averages 4.1 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.