Industry profile · NAICS 237110

Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction

Workplace injury rates across 1,829 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,829
Employers
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
19,251
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction average 3.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

3.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,829
employers reporting
19,251
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction Safety Data Reveals

The Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction sector (NAICS 237110) encompasses 1,829 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 19,251 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 38
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Water Service Center Flint, MI F 12.1
WVWA Field Operations Roanoke, VA F 12.0
Agua Link Santa Maria, CA F 11.9
Metro Equipment Service Inc Miami, FL F 11.9
Qrc, Inc. Lutz, FL F 11.9
United Enterprise, LLC Brookfield, IL F 11.9
WPCA Deep River, CT F 11.8
Ricklefs Excavating,Ltd. Anamosa, IA F 11.8
T-G Excavating Inc Catoosa, OK F 11.7
Sioux City Engineering Company Sioux City, IA F 11.7
Dorner Inc. Luxemburg, WI F 11.6
Mercer Construction Company Edna, TX F 11.5
Hydro Resources - Mid-Continent, Inc., Sunray Sunray, TX F 11.5
DW Excavating Davenport, WA F 11.5
Grundman Hicks LLC Cherokee, IA F 11.4
LFUCG - Water Quality - Sewer Line Maintenance Lexington, KY F 11.3
Staab Construction Corporation Marshfield, WI F 11.1
Frazee Construction Colorado Springs, CO F 11.1
Hydro Resources, MDC Sunray Sunray, TX F 11.1
Balkema Excavating, Inc Kalamazoo, MI F 11.1
Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Renton, WA F 11.0
Consolidated North Carolina Rock Hill, SC F 10.9
Advanced Rehabilitation Technology Bryan, OH F 10.8
Willitts Equipment Co. Inc. Exeter, CA F 10.6
Main Office Raynham, MA F 10.6
Babb Construction Co dba Delta Construction Co Eugene, OR F 10.6
Jossart Brothers Inc De Pere, WI F 10.5
Deme Construction LLC Sarasota, FL F 10.5
Triad Ohio Brooklyn, OH F 10.5
Bay Laurel Center Community Development District Ocala, FL F 10.5
Priority Excavating Pipe Construction Clive, IA F 10.4
IHRone Detroit, MI F 10.4
Shank Constructors Brooklyn Park, MN F 10.4
Staats Construction, Inc. Valencia, CA F 10.4
City of Mt. Vernon IL Public Works, Public Utilites, Parks, SSA, Quality Of Life Mt. Vernon, IL F 10.3
Advanced Water Well Technologies, LLC Converse, TX F 10.3
Hurst Excavating Knoxville, TN F 10.3
Pioneer Civil Construction Colorado Springs, CO F 10.2
S.U.R. Construction West, Inc. Winchester, NH F 10.2
Ortman Drilling, Inc. Main Kokomo, IN F 10.2
Stettler Supply Company Salem, OR F 10.1
Hunter Construction Group Inc Mooresville, NC F 10.1
Kempton Construction LLC Colorado Springs, CO F 10.0
Wenatchee Wenatchee, WA F 9.9
Rons Construction Corporation Honolulu, HI F 9.9
Utility Repair and Adjustments Inc Raleigh, NC F 9.8
La Strada Pipeline, Inc. Lake Forest, CA F 9.8
City of Saginaw Maintenance and Service Dept. Saginaw, MI F 9.8
Judds Brothers Construction Lincoln, NE F 9.7
Imperial Imperial, PA F 9.7
← Prev Page 2 of 38 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction?

This sector averages 3.9 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.