Industry profile · NAICS 562112

Waste hauling, local, hazardous

Workplace injury rates across 130 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

130
Employers
3.7
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
806
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Waste hauling, local, hazardous average 3.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
130
employers reporting
806
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Waste hauling, local, hazardous Safety Data Reveals

The Waste hauling, local, hazardous sector (NAICS 562112) encompasses 130 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 806 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Waste hauling, local, hazardous that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77BPE Independence, MO A 1.2
VLS San Diego El Cajon, CA A 1.2
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 42SIK Stratford, CT A 1.2
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77LOS Los Angeles, CA A 1.2
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 44NJ Logan Township, NJ A 1.1
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49WSC West Sacramento, CA A 1.1
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49O9 Las Vegas, NV A 1.1
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77OEA Easton, IL A 1.1
Ingenium Milpitas Milpitas, CA A 1.0
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77EPF East Chicago, IN A 1.0
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77BPC Elgin, IL A 1.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49AZ Phoenix, AZ A 0.9
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 36C6 Cincinnati, OH A 0.9
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77FAL Fallon, NV A 0.8
Cyn Oil Corporation 83EST Stoughton, MA A 0.8
Houston La Porte, TX A 0.8
HT Benton Rineco Transport Benton, AR A 0.8
Hcc Corporate-Elgin Hoffman Estates, IL A 0.8
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77SJC San Jose, CA A 0.7
Environmental Response Tempe, AZ A 0.7
HCC-CHARLOTTE Concord, NC A 0.7
HES Charlotte Charlotte, NC A 0.6
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 84YMW Romulus, MI A 0.6
Clean Earth Specialty Waste Solutions, Lancaster, TX Lancaster, TX A 0.6
Hcc Corporate-Elgin Elgin, IL A 0.6
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 404B Benicia, CA A 0.5
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77ERR East Chicago, IN A 0.5
Clym Environmental Services, LLC Frederick, MD A 0.5
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 31C1 Braintree, MA A 0.5
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 32C2 Bristol, CT A 0.5
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 49LF Compton, CA A 0.5
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77MPO Metairie, LA A 0.3
Hawaii Marine Cleaning LLC Pearl City, HI A 0.3
HES Signal Hill Signal Hill, CA C 0.0
Gurabo Gurabo, PR C 0.0
EFR Environmental Services Inc. Corporate Office Alpine, CA C 0.0
EFR Environmental Services Inc. Truck Yard Alpine, CA C 0.0
SAS Austin Austin, TX C 0.0
Corporate San Jose, CA C 0.0
Clean Harbors Caribe Inc 38F8 Manati, PR C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 21D1 Braintree, MA C 0.0
Safety Kleen Systems Inc 77GVN Rollinsford, NH C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 33C3R Linden, NJ C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 414L Canonsburg, PA C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 44NC Archdale, NC C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 34CC Reidsville, NC C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 34CCR Reidsville, NC C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 24DG Greenbrier, TN C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 25D5 Cleveland, OH C 0.0
Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 45OH Cleveland, OH C 0.0
← Prev Page 4 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Waste hauling, local, hazardous?

This sector averages 3.7 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.