State profile · OSHA ITA

Michigan workplace safety

How 16,393 OSHA-reporting employers across Michigan compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology).

16,393
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR (rated)
330,220
Injuries (all)
202
Fatalities (all)

TCR, interpreted

Far above average

5.3 avg TCR

Michigan vs all states by OSHA-reporting employer count

Where this state's ITA establishment inventory sits among every tracked state and territory (coverage signal, not a safety ranking)

16,393 9th of 54 higher than 45 of 54 states

States and territories, banded by OSHA ITA reporting employer count

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source official public datasets · 2026

The state picture

Michigan's 14,419 rated reporting employers average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.0 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.

5.3
avg TCR · rated subset
14,419
rated employers
16,393
all reporting employers
330,220
recordable injuries (all)

Inventory counts and injury/fatality totals cover all 16,393 ITA establishments; the average TCR excludes zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings. See Methodology → Three Populations.

Michigan grade distribution 16,389 graded establishments · width = share

23% of Michigan's reporting establishments earn an F and 16% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.

Where Michigan ranks among states

54 states & territories by avg TCR

Michigan's average TCR of 5.3 is lower than 47% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.

Higher avg TCRLower avg TCR

How Michigan Workplaces Compare

Michigan hosts 16,393 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this Michigan cohort, workers have logged 330,220 recordable injuries. The published state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings stay in the inventory counts above but are excluded from the average, see methodology).

The state has recorded 202 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.

For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in Michigan, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.

Employers in Michigan, by injury rate

Page 266 of 328
EmployerCityIndustryGradeAvg TCR
Mt. Clements Service centerClinton TownshipElectric Power DistributionB0.9
Pontiac Service CenterBloomfield TwspElectric Power DistributionB0.9
Sodexo at University of MichiganAnn ArborFood Service ContractorsA0.9
Petoskey MI YardPetoskeyOther Building Material DealA0.9
Aero Foil InternationalMuskegonAcceleration indicators and A0.9
Yanfeng USA Automotive Trim SystemsHarrison TwpResins, plastics (except cusA0.9
River Rouge Power PlantRiver RougeElectric power generation, fB0.9
1557_7119Wayland-A0.9
Miruu - Romulus Brokerage FacilityRomulusFreight Transportation ArranA0.9
US - Branch Network : 0234Farmington HillsMerchant Wholesalers, DurablA0.9
Northern Biomedical ResearchNorton ShoresBiological (except medical, D0.9
L3Harris Combat Propulsion SystemsMuskegonInternal combustion engines A0.9
TroyTroyIndustrial Gas DistribtionA0.9
Grand Haven StoreGrand HavenAppliance stores, household-A0.9
Lear Corporation - Building 200SouthfieldAutomotive SupplierA0.9
Caniff Service CenterDetroitElectric Power DistributionB0.9
2589_4904Holland-A0.9
Dematic - Modernizations and UpgradesGrand RapidsBelt conveyor systems manufaA0.9
Freedom Finishing IncBenton HarborCoating metals and metal proA0.9
Nagle Paving CompanyNoviAsphalt paving (i.e., highwaA0.9
RBHV Troy LLCTroyHotel building rental or leaB0.9
BiddleWyandotteCommunity action service ageA0.9
Worthington Specialty Processing TaylorTaylorRolled Steel Shape ManufactuA0.9
3850 KeystoneRosevilleAutomotive radiator repair sA0.9
Schweitzer, Inc.Battle CreekCommercial building construcA0.9
Warehousing and Fulfillment USA DBA: SherpackGrand RapidsWarehouse clubs (i.e., food A0.9
McLaren Health CareGrand BlancCentralized administrative oD0.9
Gerber Products - Fremont PlantFremontInfant and junior food canniA0.9
Chassix - StevensvilleStevensvilleAutomotive, truck and bus suA0.9
Michels Power- MIWest BranchTransmission and distributioA0.9
Holland HospitalHolland423420 Office Equipment MercA0.9
FCA Detroit Transport TerminalDetroitGeneral Freight Trucking LocA0.9
Devon Industrial GroupDetroitAcid plant constructionA0.9
C.E. Gleeson ConstructorsTroyAddition, alteration and renA0.9
Charger Logistics USA IncRomulusTrucking, general freight, lA0.9
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.WilliamsburgAcetal resins manufacturingA0.9
Power Middle SchoolFarmington HillsMiddle schoolsB0.9
CFR KalamazooKalamazooAll Other Consumer Goods RenB0.9
Caravan Facilities ManagementSaginawBuilding cleaning services, A0.9
Traverse City PlantTraverse CityPickling fruits and vegetablA0.9
Tridim Filter BellevilleBellevilleFilters, industrial and geneA0.9
Michigan Cat KalamazooPortageConstruction machinery and eA0.9
PlainfieldGrand RapidsSuperstores (i.e., food and A0.9
Wyoming 3300 Manufacturig FacilityWyomingNuts, kernels and seeds, roaA0.9
Howmet - Whitehall Castings Plant 1 and 3WhitehallNonferrous metals (except alA0.9
Yanfeng Grand RapidsGrand RapidsMotor vehicle interior systeA0.9
City of Portage - City HallPortageGeneral public administratioA0.9
Vcf 068TaylorFurniture stores (e.g., housA0.9
C & R Electric - Main OfficeShepherdElectric contractingA0.9
English Gardens- PlymouthPlymouthNursery and garden centers wA0.9
← Prev Page 266 of 328 Next →

Nationwide states with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Michigan: nearest states and territories by rated-subset average Total Case Rate and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Similar average TCR

Nearest states by rated-subset Total Case Rate (5.3 here).

Similar employer inventory

Nearest states by reporting employer count (16,393 here).

Look up a Michigan employer → · Compare all states → · How TCR is measured →

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.